What is a label claiming patent protection for an application not yet granted.

Answer: patent pending

Explanation:

Help me plss can someone answer these, Thank You!​

Which of the following is an example of an independent federal agency?
select all that apply.

FDIC
Amtrak
FEC
FCC
CIA
Fannie Mae
EPA

The death rate due to collisions increased in all driving areas at night

Should questions of social policy be left to Parliament rather than being decided by the court?

What are 10 issues discussed in Article 1 of the Constitution?

Is anyone able to list 10 plz help me. Thank you

2: When passing another vehicle, you are allowed to exceed the speed limit by?
a) O 10 mph.
b) O 5 mph.
c) O 3 mph.
d) O 0 mph.

1.What is meant by executory consideration?A. Consideration provided by an executor.B.The exchange of consideration.Where consideration has already been completedD. Where there is a promise to do something in the future

Which act restricted trade practices that sought to eliminate competition or encourage monopoly?
A. Securities Act
B. Sherman Antitrust Act
C. Nelson Act
D. Monopoly Reversal Act

State governments are required to
create two separate legislative houses.
collect sales taxes from citizens.
allow citizens to choose representatives.
O collect federal taxes from citizens.

How many bones are in the human body?​

what allows you to bend ur knees?

Differences between Universal Citizenship and Global Citizenship

benefits of the people from the government in regards to formulation of welfare for social protection

How do mandatory minimum sentencing laws increase the power of prosecutors?

Which law gives an organization more instruction and insight into the type of information security plans/policies required

Differential Treatment
<
In your opinion, what can be done to limit or eliminate differential
treatment when it comes to the courts?

Pleasantville police officers Fred and Barney were dispatched to investigate a robbery alarm call at the Hop-In liquor store. Central dispatch advised the responding units that they had attempted to call the store by phone, but there had been no answer. Upon arrival at the Hop-In, responding officers found the front door standing wide open and a male store clerk lying on the floor inside, deceased from an apparent gunshot wound to the chest. The cash register was empty and the store had been ransacked.

Officers quickly reviewed the store’s security videotape for evidence. The video depicted two male suspects, one wearing a red hooded sweatshirt and the other wearing a green T-shirt and blue baseball cap. Officers broadcast the suspects’ descriptions to other Pleasantville officers, and within an hour, two suspects were under arrest for the robbery and murder of the store clerk. The suspects were identified as Larry and Moe. Larry and Moe were booked into the Pleasantville jail and placed in separate cells pending follow-up by Pleasantville detectives.

The following morning Detective Smith interviewed the suspects separately about the robbery and murder. Detective Smith advised each of the suspects of his rights under Miranda. Both Larry and Moe refused to make any statement (invoking their Fifth Amendment protections) and demanded that they be placed back in their respective cells. Detective Smith called for jail guards to take the suspects back to their cells. As the guards were doing so, they noticed graffiti on the jail cell walls. In Moe’s cell, the wall read, “Sorry God for what I have done, no one was meant to die.” In Larry’s cell, the wall read, “I am innocent of murder, I may be guilty of robbery, but I didn’t kill anyone, it was Moe!”

Larry and Moe are charged criminally for the robbery and murder of the store clerk. During the trial the prosecutor attempts to enter the writings on the jail cell walls as evidence against both defendants. The prosecutor calls the jail guards as witnesses to testify that the graffiti writings were not on the wall prior to Larry and Moe being placed in their individual cells. The attorneys for Larry and Moe object to the writings being admitted as evidence. They base their objection on the fact that each defendant had clearly invoked his Fifth Amendment rights.

The judge advises the courtroom that she will need a few minutes to review the defendants’ objection and orders the court into a thirty-minute recess. Now it is your turn to be the judge. While reviewing defense counsels’ objection, you must decide the following:
1.Should the writings be allowed into the trial as evidence?
2.Can Moe's writing be used against him? Why or why not?
3.Can Larry's writing be used against him? Why or why not?
4.Can Larry’s writings be used against Moe? Why or why not?

Fires that occur as result of human action or inaction but without malicious intent are classified as:
Select one:
A. unintentional.
B. natural.
C. accidental.
D. negligent.

The first hate crime legislation was the Civil Rights Act of 1968.


False

True

Customer asked Will the product help me live an opulent lifestyle?

In the dual court system, the three basic tiers include trial courts, ________, and supreme courts.g

Charles wants to invest his money in something that earns money steadily
with little risk. Which should he invest in?
O A. Government bonds
O B. Stocks
O C. Mutual funds
D. Hedge funds

why Miranda is considered one of the most important cases in the history of our legal system

Eric is a Missouri resident and a sentenced offender. He was sentenced to three years of probation with the following conditions:

1. He must not violate any law of any state or any local ordinance.

2. He must report to Probation Officer Greg James monthly at a predetermined time.

3. He must not use any illegal substance or alcohol and must also submit to random testing.

4. He must obtain permission from Probation Officer James before traveling out of Missouri.

In his second year of probation, Eric was captured by store detectives stealing a satellite radio system from an electronics store in Orlando, Florida. The Orlando Police Department responded to the scene and investigated. After interviewing the store detectives, they issued Eric a misdemeanor appearance citation for shoplifting. The appearance citation contained a mandatory court date for the following month.

Approximately three months later, Probation Officer James received a letter from the local district court in Orlando, Florida. The letter informed James that probationer Eric was in Orlando in January, received a misdemeanor violation for shoplifting, and has since failed to report for the scheduled court date; a warrant has now been issued by the Orlando District Court. James reviewed probationer Eric’s file and found no record of any request to leave the state for any type of travel. Eric’s home address is listed as Springfield, Missouri.

Probation Officer James prepared all of the paperwork required to initiate probation revocation proceedings against Eric. James also sent Eric written notice that the terms of his probation had been breached and that his probation had been placed in jeopardy. The notice informed Eric that a hearing had been set for the probation revocation. During the hearing, Eric will have an opportunity to present evidence on his own behalf.

On the date of the hearing, Eric and James arrived at the courthouse to present their arguments before the presiding judge. During the hearing, Probation Officer James presented evidence supporting the alleged breach of the conditions of probation. He presented sworn statements from Orlando store detectives regarding the shoplifting incident and sworn statements from the Orlando police officer who issued Eric the misdemeanor appearance citation. Eric responded to the allegations by testifying that the Orlando misdemeanor case was a case of mistaken identity and that he was at home in Missouri during that time. James rebutted Eric’s testimony by restating that his witnesses (through their sworn statements) could attest to the fact that Eric was in fact arrested in Orlando for shoplifting the satellite radio system on the date in question. At the close of all testimony, the judge sent the courtroom into a fifteen-minute recess so that he could review all of the testimony and reread the sworn statements from the absent witnesses.

Approximately fifteen minutes later, the judge returned to the bench and announced his decision that Eric had violated the conditions of his probation agreement and should now be sent back to prison to serve out the remainder of the original sentence. The judge added that Eric will face the shoplifting charges upon release from prison. The court then served Eric with a written order stating all of the reasons for the probation revocation.

Can Probation Eric be prosecuted for shoplifting after release from prison, or would that constitute double jeopardy?

Which statement is true about early involvement of women in policing?
O A. Although police departments started employing police women in
the early twentieth century, it was not until the 1960s that women
began to hold higher-ranked administrative positions in policing.
O B. Early policewomen primarily worked with women and children,
rather than providing the same types of police services as male
officers.
O C. Prior to the appointment of the first policewoman in the early
twentieth century, police departments did not employ women,
other than occasionally to work as cleaners or secretaries.
D. The movement to involve women in policing was a fairly isolated
phenomenon, as women generally only worked in low-status non-
professional fields.

orange zest or star frost? PLEASE HELP I NEED IT

If you caught an employee stealing one dollar’s worth of office supplies, what would you do? What about twenty-five dollars’ worth of supplies? One hundred dollars’? One thousand? Should employees be trained not to even take a pencil home? Would that type of training be worth the cost of the training itself?

Which court system (of the model countries: Japan, China, Germany, France, England) would you least like to be involved with as a defendant and why?

Question 3 (1 point)
Both Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier and Tinker v Des Moines dealt with freedom of
expression
True
False

What is the process of redistricting?