Is halting problem is solvable or unsolvable?

The linear equation that shows a proportional relationship is y equals two thirds times x.

A proportional relationship is a relationship between two variables in which one variable is a constant multiple of the other. In other words, if y is directly proportional to x, then y = kx for some constant k. This can also be written as y/x = k, where k is the constant of proportionality.

The linear equation that shows a proportional relationship is y = 2/3x.

It shows a direct relationship because the coefficient of x (2/3) is constant, and there is no constant term (y-intercept) which breaks the proportionality.

The other equations do not show a proportional relationship because they have a coefficient that varies with x or a constant term.

Learn more about proportional relationship here: https://brainly.com/question/20374537

#SPJ4

Answer:

Expression: 2s + 6

# of Pages Friend Read: 14 pages

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's call the number of pages your sister has read, s, and the number of pages your friend has read, f. We will make our equation first. If your friend has read 6 more than twice as many pages as your sister has, your equation would look like this:

f = 2s + 6

That is your equation for how many pages your friend read, your expression would be just 2s + 6. Now, we will substitute in 4 for s, and we get:

f = 2 * 4 + 6

Multiplying gives:

f = 8 + 6 = 14

So your friend has read 14 pages.

Hope this helped!

Answer:

At max, Julie can buy 12 pencils. She will have 32 cents left.

Step-by-step explanation:

I did 0.39x10=3.90. Next, I did 0.30x13=5.07. I went down by one and ended up with 0.39x12=4.68.

Answer:

60%

Step-by-step explanation:

48 + 12 = 60

There is a 60% chance you randomly choose a medium out of 100 customers.

Answer:

12

Step-by-step explanation:

3 + 4 + 5 = 12

Answer: cinq minutes

Step-by-step explanation: 1h est egalle à 60minutes. Alors I'll a couru 12km Dan's 60minute. La duration pour 1km sera 60÷12=5 minutes

Answer: Zasha spent $6 on packages of gum, which means that she bought 6 / $1.20 = 5 packages of gum.

If she has a $20 bill, she has $20 - $6 = $14 left to spend on gum.

Zasha can buy an additional 14 / $1.20 = 11.6666666666666666666666667 packages of gum with this money.

Rounded down, Zasha can buy an additional 11 packages of gum.

Therefore, Zasha can buy a total of 5 + 11 = 16 packages of gum.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

D -25n-2

zbsbbwjavabwbwhvwjqv17w7wfw ggv s zg

Answer:

The second graph

Step-by-step explanation:

take x = 3 for instance, we can see that on the graph both lines intersect on y = 8

if we try it with our equations:

-2 * 3 + 14 = 8

2 * 3 + 2 = 8

Hope thi helps, please give brainliest thanks

The formula yields the radius $r$ of a circle that is inscribed within three circles with radii $a$, $b$, and $c$ that are mutually external tangents.

[tex][\frac{1}{r} = \frac{1}{a} + \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{c}][/tex]

The radius of the inscribed circle is related to the radii of the three mutually externally tangent circles using a method known as the radical centre formula. According to this equation, the reciprocals of the radii of the three externally tangent circles add up to the radius of the circle that is inscribed.

The power of point theorem states that the product of the distance between the point and the three points of tangency is equal to the product of the distance between the point and the centres of the circles. This formula is based on the fact that the circles are mutually externally tangent and their centres are collinear. It is crucial to note that the formula can only be used if the circles are mutually externally tangent; otherwise, it is invalid.

To learn more about circles: https://brainly.com/question/20489969

#SPJ4

Answer:

Least Common Denominator for the following fraction is 2

Hope this helps, have a great day!

Answer:

the answer is 56 (pls think)

The expression represents a polynomial with three terms.

A polynomial is an expression consisting of variables (often denoted by x, y, z, etc.) and coefficients, that involves only the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and non-negative integer exponents of variables. Polynomials can be used to express a wide range of algebraic equations, from simple linear equations to more complex equations. Polynomials can also be used to construct functions with properties that are useful for solving real-world problems.

The expression represents a polynomial with three terms.

The constant term is -1, and the leading coefficient is 8. The leading term is 8x³.

To know more about polynomial click-
https://brainly.com/question/15702527
#SPJ1

The distance between town a and b is 175 mi.

A scale factor is defined as the ratio between the scale of a given original object and a new object, which is its representation but of a different size.

Given that, a map drawn move to the scale 2 cm : 100 mi. on the map town b is 3.5 centimeters from town a and town c is 2 centimeters past town b

Since, 2 cm = 100 mi

1 cm = 50 mi

Therefore, 3.5 cm = 50×3.5 = 175 mi

Hence, the distance between town a and b is 175 mi.

Learn more about scale factor, click;

https://brainly.com/question/30215044

#SPJ1

Answer:

1. 128

2. 136

3. 128

4. 52

5. 44

6. 146

7. 84

8. 96

9. 96

10. 84

11.  128

12. 52

13. 44

14. 136

15. 52

16. 128

17. 136

18. 44

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

triangle) 1/2

Step-by-step explanation:

let me know if this is incorrect

A linear system has infinite solutions if it consists of exactly the same equations.

The 3  possible solutions of a linear system are:

- Unique or one solution

- Infinite solutions

- No solution

- If the linear equations are exactly (or can be transformed to exactly) the same equations, the solution is infinite.

Example:

3x + 2y = -4  ..... (equation 1)

6x = -4y - 8   ..... (equation 2)

Add 4y to both sides of equation 2:

6x + 4y = -8

Divide both sides by 3:

3x + 2y = -4

Hence, equation 2 is exactly the same as equation 1. If we plot their graphs, they will share the same graph. Any solution of equation 1 is also solution of equation 2. Therefore, this linear system has infinite solutions.

Learn more about linear system here:

https://brainly.com/question/25858757

#SPJ4

2a³b⁻⁴/3a⁵b⁻² =  2/3(ab)²

The exponent of a number shows how many times the number is multiplied by itself.

Example: 2×2×2×2 can be written as 24, as 2 is multiplied by itself 4 times. Here, 2 is called the "base" and 4 is called the "exponent" or "power."

In general, xⁿ means that x is multiplied by itself for n times.

Properties of exponents:

Law of Product: a ^m × a ^n = a ^(m + n)

Law of Quotient: a ^m/a ^n = a ^(m - n)

Law of Negative Exponent: a^-m = 1/a ^m

Law of Power of a Product: (ab)^m = a ^m . b ^m

Law of Power of a Quotient: (a/b) ^m = a ^m/b ^m

Given expression

2a³b⁻⁴/3a⁵b⁻²

= 2/3 . a³/a⁵ . b⁻⁴/b⁻²

Law of Negative Exponent: [tex]a^{-m} = 1/a^{m}[/tex]

= 2/3 . a³/a⁵ . b²/b⁴

Law of Quotient: [tex]a^{m} /a^{n} = a^{m-n}[/tex]

= 2/3 . a³⁻⁵ . b²⁻⁴

= 2/3 . a⁻² .b⁻²

Law of Power of a Product: [tex]a^{m} .b^{m}= (ab)^{m}[/tex]

= 2/3 . (ab)⁻²

Law of Negative Exponent: [tex]a^{-m} = 1/a^{m}[/tex]

= 2/3 . 1/(ab)²

= 2/3(ab)²

Hence the simplified expression of 2a³b⁻⁴/3a⁵b⁻² is  2/3(ab)².

Learn more about exponentials here:

https://brainly.com/question/26540624

#SPJ1

Answer:

9, after being converted to a mixed number

Step-by-step explanation:

Just divide 27 by 3, it’ll equal 9

yw :)

hope i helped, reach out if it’s wrong (it’s not lol)

Have a great day :3

Answer: 9

Step-by-step explanation:

since fraction means we divide the numerator by denominator, we divide 27 by 3

⇒27/3

⇒27 ÷ 3

⇒9 answer

hope that helps ...

Answer:

1. a

2. d

3. none of the above - correct answer is root 133. there has to be a typo I think. if they force you to choose do C.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

i think its b

Step-by-step explanation:

Lines running horizontally and vertically are parallel. So, angles A, B, and C are right angles by definition of perpendicular lines. All right angles are equal. Therefore, △ABC ~ △DEF by the SAS similarity theorem.

Given that startfraction a b over d e endfraction = startfraction b c over e f endfraction = one-half

Step 1: Multiply both sides of the equation by de:

a/b * de = bc/ef * de

Step 2: Simplify the left side of the equation:

ade = bcde

Step 3: Divide both sides of the equation by ad:

a/d = b/e

Step 4: Multiply both sides of the equation by be:

ab/d = be/e

Step 5: Simplify the left side of the equation:

ab = be

Step 6: Divide both sides of the equation by be:

a/b = 1/e

Step 7: Multiply both sides of the equation by ef:

a/b * ef = 1/e * ef

Step 8: Simplify the left side of the equation:

aef = ef

Step 9: Divide both sides of the equation by ef:

a/b = 1/e

Conclusion: startfraction a b over d e endfraction = startfraction b c over e f endfraction = one-half

Learn more about angle here

https://brainly.com/question/28451077

#SPJ4

Answer:

perpendicular

b and e

congruent

Answer:

#1 multiply

#2 divide

#3 subtract

#4 subtract

#5 divide

Answer:

$18

Step-by-step explanation:

To find how many times she has saved money, you would do 27/3=9. This means that she worked 9 times. Since she worked 9 times, she earned $45 in total. To find how much she saved you would do 45-27=$18

Answer: He received $3.51 in change.

Step-by-step explanation:

To get the answer we can subtract the amount Felix paid ($20) by the cost of the dinner ($16.49).

It will look like this:

$20.00 - $16.49 = $3.51

Answer:3 dollars and 51 cents

Step-by-step explanation:

If the recycling facility picks up 96 full barrels on each trip then there is 9 days gap between each pickup.

Recycling is the practice of reusing materials in existing products to create new ones. This can be accomplished in expected ways—such as using recycled paper as packaging material—or unexpected ways—such as using recycled glass to make artificial turf. Recycling helps to conserve limited resources, and—its proponents argue—it has other environmental benefits as well.

Since the recycling facility picks up 96 barrels on each trip

and each barrel contains 30 quarts of effluent.

Thus, the total volume of wastewater is 30 x 96, or 2880 quarts.

Each barrel is filled at a rate of 13 quarts per hour.

So 2880 quarts filled in hours.

We can now change 221.54 hours to days.

= 9.23 days

There are so 9 days in between pickups.

To learn more about quarts visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13798723

#SPJ4

The correct option that tests the given claim on statistics is; D. False. In statistics, results are not reported with 100% certainty. Because statistical studies draw on samples, and because there is variation within groups, results cannot be reported with 100 % certainty.

Statistical research is defined as the rigorous development of improved or new statistical methods grounded in probability and statistical theory.

Statistical data analysis is basically a procedure that is used to perform various statistical operations.

Now, from the question, the claim is that In statistics, results are always reported with 100 % certainty.

Now, this claim needs to be examined because there is no perfect human being and as such since statistics is drawn from a lot of samples and groups, there is guaranteed to be some form of variability in responses or results as the case may be.

Therefore, we can say that is option D.

Read more about statistics research at; https://brainly.com/question/15703255

#SPJ1

Answer:

He is wrong. The right answer is 56.35. Or 56 7/20

Step-by-step explanation:

So lets go over what we know.

The width is 5 3/4ft.

The length is 9 4/5 ft.

The square feet is l*w, otherwise known as area.

So in this, we multiply 5 3/4 by 9 4/5.

Before we multiply however, lets put this into decimal form. Its easier to think of it this way.

3/4, or 3 divided by 4, is 0.75 So 5 3/4 is actually 5.75

4/5, or 4 divided by 5, is 0.80. So 9 4/5 is actually 9.8

Now lets multiply:

5.75*9.8

This might seem a bit confusing, but here is a step by step way of how I multiplied:

5*9 is 45. 5 times 8 is 40. Move the decimal since we used 8 instead of .8 its now:

45 and 4.0

Which is 49.

Now lets multiply 9.8 by the 0.75

3/4ths of 9 is 6.75. 3/4 of 8 is 6. Again, move over the decimal since we used 8 instead of .8 its now:

6.75 and .6

This is 7.35

Add that to 49:

56.35

So this is your answer.

Now, this is not what Mr.Klimek got.

So he is wrong.

The real answer is 56.35

To find the fractional form of this, we can take the decimal 35 and put it over 100:

35/100

Then simplfy. In this case 5 goes into both numbers. So:

7/20

So we have 56 7/20.

Now, the final question, what did Mr.Klimek do wrong?

Well, he added his length and width, instead of multiplying.

We already know what our two numbers equal: 9.8 and 5.75.

Lets add these:

9 plus 5 is 14. 0.8+0.75 is 1.55.

14+1.55=15.55

Using the method of transfering  fractions I spoke of above:

55/100

5 goes into both numbers:

11/20

So adding the lenght and width, we got 15 11/20. This is what Mr.Klimek did.

So to sum up each answer:

Hope this helps! :D

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Parallel algorithms are not always faster than sequential algorithms. In general, the speed of an algorithm depends on a variety of factors, including the complexity of the algorithm, the hardware it is running on, and the specific problem it is trying to solve.

There are some cases where a parallel algorithm can be faster than a sequential algorithm. For example, if an algorithm can be easily divided into smaller subproblems that can be solved independently and then combined to get the final result, it may be possible to speed up the overall computation by using a parallel algorithm to solve the subproblems in parallel. This can be particularly effective if the subproblems are large and can be solved using multiple processor cores or distributed across multiple computers.

However, there are also cases where a sequential algorithm may be faster than a parallel algorithm. For example, if the problem is relatively small and can be solved efficiently using a single processor, it may not be worth the overhead of dividing the problem into smaller subproblems and coordinating their solution in parallel. In addition, some algorithms may be more difficult to parallelize, or may not lend themselves well to a parallel solution, in which case a sequential algorithm may be a better choice.

Overall, it is important to carefully consider the specific problem and available hardware when deciding whether to use a parallel or sequential algorithm.