Law
Using the Department of Justice Organizational Chart, identify three federal law enforcement agencies that are of interest to you.Once you have identified the three agencies that are of interest to you, go to the agencys website and research the requirements and training for each agency. Make a chart that identifies the following information for all three agencies:What is the minimum age for applicants?What are the minimum physical requirements hearing, vision, etc. for all applicants?What is the minimum education requirement for applicants?Are there any physical tests that measure specific physical abilities? If so, what are those abilities?Is there a background check? What areas are covered by the check?Is there a psychological evaluation, lie detector test, or similar kind of test to measure mental characteristics and mental health?Where does training take place? Is this the same facility for all applicants? Why or why not?How long is training?What is covered in training?How are candidates evaluated during training? Are there options to retake tests that are failed?Once training is completed, what is the next step in the career path? Describe this step, whether it is additional training, a field placement, or something else.Once you have answered all of the above questions for each agency, compare and contrast the agencies. Write a 450-word discussion of the similarities and differences between the agencies that you studied. Make sure to address why these agencies show similarities or differences.Make sure your work is typed in a standard 12-point font, spell-checked, and double spaced, and submit your work to your teacher.
A seller and a purchaser signed a contract for the sale of a 60-year-old house. The contract required a general warranty deed to be given at closing. The contract was silent regarding the condition of the house, and the purchaser did not ask. The purchaser received a general warranty deed with all covenants of title at the closing and promptly recorded the deed. The seller made no disclosures to the purchaser regarding the condition of the property. Approximately one month after the closing, the furnace in the house stopped working, the basement flooded, and the roof leaked so badly that the second floor could not be occupied. The seller, when told of the house's condition, was genuinely surprised.No, because the seller gave no disclosures regarding the condition of the house. Since there are no applicable statutes, we do not have any required disclosures. And since the seller did not make any disclosures, she cannot be liable for making an affirmative representation. Basically, since this jurisdiction seems to not require any disclosures, we are back to the days of "buyer beware".