Answer: a sharp rise in inflation-adjusted wages
working closely with members of the tejano elite in texas, how did anglo settlers in texas undermine the anti-slavery provisions of the mexican constitution?
Anglo settlers in Texas undermined the anti-slavery provisions of the Mexican Constitution by working closely with members of the Tejano elite.
As the Anglo settlers began to flood into Texas, they found themselves at odds with the Tejano elite. The Tejano elite, who had been in Texas for generations, saw the Anglo settlers as a threat to their way of life. They were afraid that the Anglo settlers would take over their land, their businesses, and their culture.
However, the Anglo settlers were able to work their way into the Tejano elite's good graces by offering them money and political power. In exchange for their support, the Anglo settlers were able to undermine the anti-slavery provisions of the Mexican Constitution.
They did this by bringing in more and more slaves from the United States. The Tejano elite, who had originally been opposed to slavery, soon saw the financial benefits of owning slaves. They began to buy slaves themselves, and they also used their political power to protect the Anglo settlers' right to own slaves.
To know more about Anglo settlers, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6282145#
#SPJ11
Trade agreements such as GATT (General Agreement on and Trade) were critical to U.S. trade policy during the twentieth century because they- created export opportunities with communist countries helped increase prices of consumer goods established access to overseas markets provided common regulations for consumer products
Answer:
established access to overseas markets
Explanation:
Trade agreements such as GATT were critical to U.S. trade policy because they helped establish access to overseas markets by reducing barriers to trade and increasing market access for goods and services. This opened up new markets for U.S. exports and helped American businesses compete globally
The correct answer is: "Established access to overseas markets."
Trade agreements such as GATT (General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade) were critical to U.S. trade policy during the twentieth century because they helped to establish access to overseas markets. These agreements reduced trade barriers such as tariffs and quotas, making it easier for U.S. companies to export their goods to other countries.
By opening up overseas markets, U.S. companies were able to increase their sales and profits, which in turn helped to boost the U.S. economy. These agreements also helped to promote economic growth and development in other countries by providing them with access to U.S. goods and services.
While trade agreements like GATT also addressed other issues related to international trade, such as the regulation of trade in services and intellectual property rights, their main focus was on promoting trade liberalization and reducing trade barriers between countries.
Who in the military chain of command made the final official decision whether to use the atomic bomb? a. pilot paul tibbets b. president franklin roosevelt c. president harry truman d. general douglas macarthur
The final official decision to use the atomic bomb during World War II was made by President Harry Truman, who was the Commander-in-Chief of the United States military at the time.
General Douglas MacArthur did not have the authority to make such a decision, as he was a subordinate military commander responsible for carrying out orders from higher authorities. The pilot of the Enola Gay, Paul Tibbets, was responsible for delivering the atomic bomb, but did not have the authority to decide whether or not to use it. Ultimately, President Truman made the difficult decision to use the atomic bomb in order to bring an end to the war with Japan and prevent further American casualties.
To know more about atomic bomb click here:
brainly.com/question/1168541
#SPJ4
Answer:
President Harry Truman
Explanation:
by 1912, the socialist party had dwindled, losing many of their political office posts and lessening ties with radical newspapers and magazines. group of answer choices true false
The given statement "By 1912, the Socialist Party had dwindled, losing many of their political office posts and lessening ties with radical newspapers and magazines" is true because the Socialist Party of America was established in 1901 as a union of various socialist and labor groups, with Eugene V. Debs, a former railway worker and labor leader, as its first presidential candidate in 1904.
The party's membership increased in the years that followed, reaching its peak of over 100,000 members in 1912. It was able to win over 1,000 political office positions, including mayoral positions in cities like Milwaukee, Schenectady, and Flint.
However, during World War I, many socialists and labor leaders, including Debs, were jailed for their pacifist and anti-war positions.
The party was further weakened by the Bolshevik Revolution and the establishment of the Communist Party in 1919.By 1912, the Socialist Party had dwindled, losing many of their political office posts and lessening ties with radical newspapers and magazines. This statement is true.
For such more question on Socialist:
https://brainly.com/question/3953868
#SPJ11
The nation's plan for dealing with other nations is called
Answer: Foreign Policy
Explanation:
Answer:
Foreign policy.
Explanation:
A nation's overall plan for dealing with other nations.
The ___ had a successful career against the British Navy.
USS Continental
USS Chesapeake
USS Coalportus
USS Congress
USS Constitution
Answer:
USS Constitution
Explanation:
Constitution is generally noted for her activities during the Conflict of 1812 against the Assembled Realm, when she caught various trader ships and crushed five more modest English warships: HMS Guerriere, Java, Pictou, Cyane, and Levant.
Which statement best completes the diagram?
Cause
Apartheid begins in
South Africa.
Effect
?
A. White South Africans cannot travel without permission.
B. Black South Africans begin moving to big cities.
C. Black South Africans cannot work many jobs.
D. White South Africans lose all their property.
Option C is the correct option, Black South Africans cannot work many jobs.
The misery of the nation's high unemployment rate appears to be laid bare in stark numbers in a graphic that has been extensively shared in South Africa. The picture, which was published on in June 2021, asserts that black unemployment was at least ten times higher in 2020 than it was in 1994, the year the African National Congress (ANC), the ruling party, took office. People who are unemployed but who have the potential to work or start a business but who haven't done either despite actively looking. Only those who have actively sought employment are included in the official, or rigorous, definition of unemployed. Disappointed job searchers are included in the broad or enlarged definition of unemployment.
To know more about Despite refer :
brainly.com/question/31099275
#SPJ1
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I got the answer right.
Describe the changes made to the seaside boarding
houses in ww2
During World War II, seaside boarding houses were repurposed to serve as accommodation for military personnel and evacuees.
Changes made to the seaside boardinghouses in ww2 ?Many boarding houses were requisitioned by the government and converted into barracks, hospitals, or administrative offices. Some boarding houses that were not suitable for military purposes were converted into temporary homes for evacuees fleeing from urban areas. These changes allowed the boarding houses to play an important role in the war effort, by providing necessary facilities for the military and helping to accommodate the mass movement of people during the conflict. After the war, some of the boarding houses were returned to their original use, while others remained as public or government buildings.
To know more about seaside boarding houses in ww2 , visit :
https://brainly.com/question/30721795
#SPJ1
Which of the following is an example of
Which factor contributed most to the beginning of the women's-rights movement in the United States during the mid-1800s?f a foreign policy issue?
Answer:
E
Explanation:
E
use an internet search to find information about the causes of the sinking of the titanic ship in 1912.
Answer:The immediate cause of RMS Titanic's demise was a collision with an iceberg that caused the ocean liner to sink on April 14–15, 1912. While the ship could reportedly stay afloat if as many as 4 of its 16 compartments were breached, the impact had affected at least 5 compartments.
Explanation:
What’s the difference between the holocaust in the civil rights movement?
Holocaust and the Civil Rights Movement were significant historical events that involved discrimination and oppression of minority groups, they were distinct in terms of their time period, causes, actors, and consequences.
What are these diference?Consequences: The Holocaust resulted in the death of approximately six million Jews and millions of other minority groups, as well as significant destruction and displacement in Europe. The Civil Rights Movement led to significant changes in U.S. laws and policies, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which helped to reduce racial discrimination and promote equal opportunities for African Americans.
Time period and context: The Holocaust took place during World War II in Europe (1939-1945) and was primarily a result of Nazi Germany's systematic genocide of Jews and other minority groups. The Civil Rights Movement, on the other hand, took place in the United States during the 1950s and 1960s and was a struggle for equal rights and opportunities for African Americans.
Learn more about civil rights movement at:
https://brainly.com/question/131269
#SPJ1
what was the central question confronted by the second continental congress when it began meeting in may 1775?
The central question confronted by the Second Continental Congress when it began meeting in May 1775 was whether to declare independence from Great Britain.
The Second Continental Congress was a convention of delegates from the Thirteen Colonies that started meeting in May 1775.
By the time they met, several battles had already been fought between British and colonial forces and the colonists had already declared themselves to be in a state of open rebellion against Great Britain.
The Second Continental Congress had to decide what steps should be taken next to achieve independence from the British.
Some delegates argued for a negotiated settlement with Britain, while others argued for a declaration of independence. After long and vigorous debate, the Congress ultimately decided to issue a declaration of independence.
To know more about Continental Congress click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/324881#
#SPJ11
The system of____
is really the cause of this dispute between 2 countries to become a world war
Answer choices: Judges
Imperialism
Alliances
Militarism
The system of Alliances is really the cause of this dispute between 2 countries to become a world war.
What is the system of alliances all about?Alliances were one of the major factors that led to the escalation of World War I into a global conflict. The complex web of alliances between various countries meant that when one country went to war, its allies were obligated to join in, leading to a domino effect of declarations of war. The Triple Entente (consisting of France, Russia, and the United Kingdom) and the Central Powers (consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy) were two such alliances that played a significant role in the outbreak of World War I.
Find more useful information on the system of alliance;
https://brainly.com/question/16496449
#SPJ1
in doc c, examine british naval expenses in 1914. do the germans have reason to worry about freedom of the seas? explain.
The German empire was concerned about the free use of the high seas, and their naval spending would become a pressing issue in the years to come.
The German Empire was surrounded by a chain of hostile neighbors: France to the west, Russia to the east, and Great Britain to the north. In addition to that, the German naval development was compared to Great Britain's naval supremacy, which caused much concern.In 1906, the HMS Dreadnought was launched by the British, a new type of battleship that was far superior to any other ship in the world.
Britain, as a result of their naval supremacy, has full control of the high seas. Germany increased its naval spending and launched its own dreadnoughts in response, putting pressure on the British Empire's naval dominance. As a result, tensions between the two nations heightened.
In 1914, Germany was concerned about its navy's ability to safeguard its commercial and naval transport, which could be cut off if Britain were to intercept Germany's navy on the high seas. As a result, Germany was concerned about the free use of the high seas, and their naval spending would become a pressing issue in the years to come.
To know more about German Empire, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30416159#
#SPJ11
what factors led to the decline of the spanish and portuguese based on their height of power in the 1450 to 1750 time.
The main factors leading to the decline of the Spanish and Portuguese during the 1450-1750 time period were increased competition from other European powers, European diseases.
The other factors are internal struggles, and lack of technological advancements.
Competition from other European powers, particularly the Dutch and English, grew significantly during this time period. This led to a decrease in their imperial influence, as their rivals took away trade routes, land, and colonies.
European diseases like smallpox and measles were highly contagious and spread quickly, decimating the Native American populations in their colonies. This decreased the amount of labor available, leading to economic decline.
Internal struggles, such as the struggle between Philip II and the Cortes, made it difficult for the Spanish and Portuguese to maintain control of their colonies.
Finally, lack of technological advancements compared to their European rivals made them less competitive and unable to keep up with the other powers. They were unable to build better ships, develop new weaponry, or use advanced navigational techniques. This led to a decline in their power.
To know more about European powers click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/12211490#
#SPJ11
State 5 benefits of having different ethnic groups in Ghana
Five benefits of having different ethnic groups in Ghana are:
Cultural DiversityEconomic DevelopmentNational UnitySocial CohesionPolitical StabilityCultural Diversity: Having different ethnic groups in Ghana contributes to cultural diversity, which enriches the country's traditions, customs, and practices. Each ethnic group has its unique history, language, music, and cuisine, which make Ghana a vibrant and culturally rich society.Economic Development: Different ethnic groups have different skills, talents, and expertise, which contribute to economic development. For example, some ethnic groups are known for their expertise in agriculture, while others are known for their business acumen or artisanal skills.National Unity: The presence of different ethnic groups in Ghana promotes national unity by fostering a sense of belonging and shared identity. Ghana's motto, "Unity in Diversity," reflects the importance of acknowledging and celebrating ethnic diversity while promoting national cohesion.Social Cohesion: The presence of different ethnic groups in Ghana promotes social cohesion by encouraging cross-cultural interaction and understanding. This helps to reduce stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination and foster a more inclusive and tolerant society.Political Stability: The presence of different ethnic groups in Ghana contributes to political stability by ensuring that power is distributed across different groups. This helps to prevent the dominance of one ethnic group over others and promotes a more equitable and inclusive political system.In summary, the presence of different ethnic groups in Ghana contributes to cultural diversity, economic development, national unity, social cohesion, and political stability.
To know more about the Ethnic group, here
https://brainly.com/question/2555360
#SPJ4
the rapid social changes in europe, particularly in great britain during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, were mainly due to:
The rapid social changes in Europe, particularly in Great Britain during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, were mainly due to the Industrial Revolution.
The industrial revolution was a period of major change in the way goods were produced, and it brought with it significant social changes.
How did the Industrial Revolution affect social changes in Europe?The Industrial Revolution in Europe caused several social changes. It led to an increase in the population, which put a strain on the resources, food, and housing. It also resulted in the growth of cities as people moved from rural areas to the towns in search of jobs.
The following are the ways in which the Industrial Revolution brought social changes in Europe:
It led to urbanization which caused an increase in population and led to the growth of cities.It led to a new system of labor and production, which brought changes in the social class system.It led to an increase in the standard of living for some, while others faced poor living and working conditions.There was a change in the social structure, and new industries brought new opportunities for some people while some others were left behind due to their lack of education and training.It led to the emergence of the middle class, which became an influential group in the society. This middle class emerged as a result of the new industries that sprouted up during the industrial revolution.These are some of the ways in which the Industrial Revolution brought about social changes in Europe, particularly in Great Britain during the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
To know more about Industrial Revolution, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/855594#
#SPJ11
Why was the appointment of sonia sotomayor to the supreme court historic?
Sotomayor has been identified with concern for defendant rights and criminal justice reform during her Supreme Court tenure, and she is known for her impassioned dissents on issues of race, ethnicity, and gender identity, including Schuette v. BAMN, Utah v. Strieff, and Trump v. Hawaii.
Sotomayor was quickly on the short list amid expectations that President Obama would nominate a judge with a "common touch" and empathy.
He nominated Sotomayor on May 26, 2009, and she was confirmed by the Senate on August 6, 2009, on a 68-31 vote divided mostly along party lines.
As a member of the Court, Sotomayor has consistently sided with the unofficial liberal bloc of justices on ideological differences.
Throughout her tenure on the Supreme Court, Sotomayor has been known for her passionate dissents on issues of race, gender, and ethnic identity.
Learn more about Sonia Sotomayor here
https://brainly.com/question/30131862
#SPJ4
discuss the goals and outcomes of reconstruction plans. in what ways were reconstruction goals unfinished, especially in the south?
Answer: the answer is D
Explanation:
what barriers to minority voting existed, despite the passage of the thirteenth, fourteenth, and fifteenth amendments, throughout the late 19th and early-to-mid 20th centuries?
Despite the passage of the Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments, which abolished slavery, granted citizenship and equal protection under the law, and prohibited the denial of voting rights based on race, barriers to minority voting continued to exist throughout the late 19th and early-to-mid 20th centuries in the United States. Some of the most significant barriers included:
Poll taxes: Some states required citizens to pay a fee to vote, which disproportionately affected poor and minority voters who could not afford to pay.Literacy tests: Some states required potential voters to pass a literacy test, which was often designed to be so difficult that even highly educated individuals could not pass.Grandfather clauses: Some states allowed individuals to vote only if their grandfathers had been eligible to vote, which effectively excluded African Americans whose grandfathers had been slaves and were unable to vote.Intimidation and violence: Many African Americans were threatened, beaten, or killed for attempting to register to vote or exercise their right to vote.Gerrymandering: Some states used redistricting to dilute the voting power of minority communities.These barriers to minority voting persisted until the Civil Rights Movement of the 1950s and 1960s, when activists fought for and secured greater protections for voting rights, including the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
Learn more about voting rights:
https://brainly.com/question/582433
#SPJ11
why were the americans justified in acquiring colonial, territories despite compromising your morals
The Americans were justified in acquiring colonial territories despite compromising their morals because of the following reasons:
Economic Gain: The acquisition of colonial territories could bring economic benefits to the Americans. Many of these territories had rich resources that the Americans could exploit to increase their wealth.
Political Power: The acquisition of territories would also give the Americans greater political power. They could use their new territories to expand their influence in the world and to project their power beyond their borders.
Strategic Positioning: The acquisition of territories would also give the Americans strategic advantages. By controlling key territories, they could secure their borders and protect their interests from potential threats.
Military Expansion: The acquisition of territories would also allow the Americans to expand their military capabilities. They could use their new territories as bases from which to launch military operations and to project their power beyond their borders.
In conclusion, the Americans were justified in acquiring colonial territories despite compromising their morals because they believed that the benefits of expansion outweighed the moral costs. They saw expansion as a necessary step in the development of their country and as a means of securing their future.
To learn more about colonial territories, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30587131
#SPJ11
The Americans were justified in acquiring colonial territories because of their belief in Manifest Destiny.
Manifest Destiny was the idea that the United States had the right to expand its territory and borders across the continent. This idea helped them to justify their territorial expansion, as they believed that their expansion was part of the divine plan for the United States.
This belief allowed them to compromise their morals and expand their borders.
To explain further, the concept of Manifest Destiny was used to justify the United States’ territorial expansion. This idea held that the United States had the right and the obligation to expand their borders across the continent, so as to fulfill the divine plan.
This belief in Manifest Destiny was used to justify their acquisition of colonial territories, even if it meant compromising their morals. This expansion led to the United States’ acquisition of large swaths of land, including Alaska and Hawaii.
To know more about colonial territories click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30587131#
#SPJ11
The U. S. Has contributed roughly $100 billion of the $150 billion cost of what object, which officials plan to open up to more commercial visits in the months ahead?
When the U.S. has contributed roughly $100 billion of the $150 billion cost of what object, the economic officials plan to open up to additional commercial visits in the upcoming months.
The economic officials can be referred to or taken into consideration as the officials that have a direct objective of doing the economic welfare of the society. These officials also hold the supreme authorities to take decisions in the matters related thereto, and may make more and more commercial visits, if it deems fit.
Learn more about economic officials here:
https://brainly.com/question/8112874
#SPJ4
u.s. army lt. thomas e. selfridge became the first ever casualty of an airplane crash when he died in a 1908 test flight piloted by orville wright, at what location?
U.S. Army Lt. Thomas E. Selfridge became the first ever casualty of an airplane crash when he died in a 1908 test flight piloted by Orville Wright at Fort Myer, Virginia.
What was the cause of the accident?Orville Wright was flying a two-seater airplane, and Selfridge was his passenger.
After four minutes of flight, there was a problem with the airplane's controls, causing it to nosedive from an altitude of approximately 150 feet.
The crash severely injured Wright, and Selfridge died within hours from a fractured skull.
What was Thomas E. Selfridge’s job at the time of the airplane crash?Lieutenant Thomas E. Selfridge was a U.S. Army officer, and at the time of the airplane crash, he was serving as an officer in the U.S. Army Signal Corps.
Selfridge's father was also a US Army officer who had served in the American Civil War.
To know more about Orville Wright refer here
https://brainly.com/question/27588161#
#SPJ11
Now read the quote from Teddy Rosesevelt. Based on what you know about nationalism is this more nationalitic or patriotic .Explain?
Based on this quote, Teddy Roosevelt's stance appears to be more patriotic than nationalistic. He emphasizes the importance of supporting a leader insofar as they serve the country efficiently.
Teddy Roosevelt highlights the value of supporting the nation over any specific leader or official in the quotation.According to him, supporting a leader only insofar as they effectively serve the nation is an act of patriotism.This suggests a dedication to the general good as opposed to slavish fealty to a certain leader or country.He promotes opposition to a leader who disobeys their obligation to support the nation by putting the needs and interests of the nation before those of the particular leader.This strategy is in line with patriotism's core values, which include love and fidelity to one's nation.On the other hand, nationalism occasionally entails blind loyalty to one's government or leader without taking into account their policies or effects on the nation.
learn more about Teddy Roosevelt's here:
https://brainly.com/question/3155657
#SPJ1
Answer:
Based on this quote, Teddy Roosevelt's stance appears to be more patriotic than nationalistic. He emphasizes the importance of supporting a leader insofar as they serve the country efficiently.
The culture/history/people of Ojibwe
With about 200,000 members in the US and Canada, the Ojibwe, usually referred to as the Chippewa, are a Native American ethnic group.
With a traditional way of life centered around hunting, fishing, and gathering, they have a deep historical and cultural connection to the Great Lakes region. Important facets of their cultural identity include their language, art, and storytelling traditions.
Quillwork and elaborate beadwork are two well-known Ojibwe traditional arts that have been handed down through the years. Notwithstanding the difficulties they have faced, the Ojibwe have persevered and have kept their culture and customs alive throughout their history, which has been defined by colonization, displacement, and forced assimilation.
They now play a significant role in the development of North American culture.
Learn more about Ojibwa:
https://brainly.com/question/6677167
How did Americans reconcile their differences about going to war?
Answer:
Americans reconciled their differences about going to war by engaging in dialogue and debate about the merits of going to war. This dialogue and debate allowed for a better understanding of the different perspectives on the issue and ultimately helped to bridge the divide between those who supported and opposed going to war. Additionally, Americans sought to find common ground and compromise on the issue, which helped to bring the two sides closer together. Finally, Americans also worked to build consensus and find a way to move forward in a unified way.
what was the oseberg ship burial, where this viking ship from the early ninth century was discovered? art chaqpter 8
In essence, the Oseberg ship means the well-preserved Viking ship which was unearthed in a vast burial site at Tonsberg in Vestfold county, Norway.
What should we know about Oseberg ship burial?The Oseberg Ship Burial is a Viking Age archaeological site located in Norway, where a Viking ship from the early ninth century was discovered in 1903. The burial mound contained a well-preserved ship, which was used as a coffin for two women of high rank.
The ship was elaborately decorated with carvings of animals and Norse mythological scenes, and it contained a wealth of grave goods, including textiles, furniture, tools, weapons, and even a sleigh. The Oseberg Ship Burial is considered one of the most important archaeological discoveries of the Viking Age, providing a unique glimpse into the material culture and beliefs of the Viking society. Today, the burial site is now a popular tourist attraction and a museum that houses the artifacts found in the excavation.
Read more about Oseberg ship burial
brainly.com/question/27040903
#SPJ1
What do you thunk each major symbol in this political cartoon means? And explain how the words in the cartoon clarify the symbols.
Due to a technicality, Bill Cosby is no longer in prison, however the women he raped and who courageously came forward to report him to authorities are once again suffering.
When will Bill Cosby be let out?After receiving a minimum three-year term, Cosby was freed from prison in 2021 after his conviction was overturned by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court. They believed they had finally found some form of closure, and then this happened.
In 2019, Cosby filed an appeal against the Constand case conviction, arguing that the court should not have permitted five more women to testify claiming he them in addition to earlier allegations.
To know more about Bill Cosby visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1029858
#SPJ1
What were the Ottoman Empire's motives for carrying out the Armenian genocide and its impact on its Armenian subjects?
The Armenian Genocide was a systematic extermination of the Armenian population by the Ottoman Empire during World War I. The Ottoman Empire was motivated by various factors to carry out the genocide, including nationalism, religious differences, and economic interests.
One of the primary motives for the Armenian Genocide was nationalism. The Ottoman Empire was a Muslim state, and the Armenian population was largely Christian. As nationalism and the desire for homogeneity increased in the Ottoman Empire, the Armenian population was viewed as a threat to the empire's unity and identity.
The Ottoman Empire also had economic interests in the region, and the Armenian population was seen as a potential economic rival. Many Armenians were involved in business, and some were wealthy landowners. The Ottoman Empire saw the elimination of the Armenian population as a way to gain control of their economic resources.
The impact of the Armenian Genocide on the Armenian population was devastating. Estimates suggest that between 1 and 1.5 million Armenians were killed or deported during the genocide. The genocide had a profound impact on Armenian culture, as many churches, monasteries, and cultural sites were destroyed. The Armenian population was also displaced from their homes, and many were forced to flee the country.
The Armenian Genocide remains a significant event in Armenian history, and the Armenian community worldwide continues to demand recognition of the genocide as a deliberate act of genocide by the Ottoman Empire.
Click to review the online content. Then answer the question(s) below, using complete sentences. Scroll down to view additional
questions.
Online Content: Site 1
Consider the satellite picture showing land formations. Could you also use this map to plan cattle drives??
The answer is Yes, The map can be used to plan cattle drives.
Cattle drives this is the process of moving or transporting a herd of cattle from one destinations, place to another, they are usually moved and herded by cowboy usually on foot or horses. from the map provided above cattle drive can be planned considering the land relief and formation shown on the map.
Do cattle drives mean?drive a herd of cattle the act of forcing a herd of cattle (such as bulls, cows, or steers) to travel over a sizable distance across the countryside while being taken by drovers on horses, frequently over the course of many days.
The biggest cattle drive ever?From 1866 through 1870, the price of cattle rose gradually. As a result, the 1871 drive to Midwest markets was the biggest ever: 700,000 Texas cattle were transported to Kansas alone.
To know more about Cattle Drives visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16118067
#SPJ1