Virginia law states that one should use headlights when driving at night, during poor weather conditions and when using windshield wipers.
Motorists must drive at night with their headlights on. Virginia has not specified an exact time to use the searchlight. Instead, the law requires drivers to use their headlights from sunset to sunrise.
Drivers must use their headlights in bad weather.
By law, whenever rain, smoke, fog, snow, sleet, poor lighting conditions, or other adverse weather conditions reduce visibility and prevent him from clearly seeing people or vehicles on the road at a distance of 500 feet , must use headlights.
Finally, drivers should use their headlights whenever windshield wipers are used as a result of fog, rain, sleet, or snow. However, headlights are not required for intermittent wiper use in drizzle, sleet or snow.
To learn more about ‘headlights’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/4497905
#SPJ4
Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views? Explain your answer.
Answer:
In my opinion, people should not be prohibited from expressing their opinions under any circumstances, given the individual freedom of each individual to think independently, unless the ideas expressed were totally contrary to the common good (such as expressions that promote terrorism or defending regimes such as Nazism).
In other words, as long as the opinions of individuals do not promote violence or damage to society, they should be allowed, to guarantee the freedom of expression of citizens.
What was the main impact of the civil disobedience movement?
The main impact of the civil disobedience movement was that it laid down the groundwork for freedom struggle and created mistrust amongst the masses against the British.
After Gandhi's event in Dandi, opposition to the salt bans spread across the nation. In Madras, Calcutta, and Karachi, there were large-scale demonstrations after Nehru was imprisoned in April 1930 for breaking the salt law.
As a result of the disobedience of the salt law, the Civil Disobedience Movement expanded across the nation.
Manufacturing of salt expanded nationwide during the first stage of the civil disobedience campaign, and it came to represent the populace's opposition to the government.
Civil disobedience has proven to been be successful. It has also been used to reform government and public policy, win equality for those who have faced discrimination, and win acceptance for socially marginalized groups.
To know more about civil disobedience movement, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10905304
#SPJ4
is the property of being physically or mentally capable.
A . Grit
B. Individualism
C. Self confidence
D. Strength
Answer:
D.Strength
ALL done
Why did Churchill warn against the Munich Pact?
Churchill warned against the Munich Pact as believed that it would soon lead to Germany gaining more territories and might lead to another war.
He called it a complete and unmitigated defeat.
It became clear by 1936 that Hitler's had greater plans to expand Germany's boundaries, especially when his troops entered the Rhineland.
He soon annexed Austria only two years later, in March 1938.
Neville Chamberlain, while at the Munich Conference in 1939, agreed that Germany could gain the laid of Sudetenland, thereby seemingly averting any was in near future.
This was called the Munich Agreement.
However, Winston Churchill, one of the few critics of the appeasement policy, boldly described it as ‘an unmitigated disaster’. He however fell out of public support and very few agreed with him.
Finally his prophecy seemed to have come true. Hitler violated the Munich Agreement, March 1939, by occupying the rest of Czechoslovakia.
Soon, only six months later, Germany invaded Poland and Britain found itself at war, once again.
To know more about Munich Pact, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29770761
#SPJ4
What type of government Thoreau prefers at the beginning of civil disobedience?
Thoreau prefers a laissez faire type of government that is a capitalist form.
The phrase “that government is best which governs least” is most often attributed to Henry David Thoreau. He sued this in his 1849 “Civil Disobedience”
According to him, the less the government held matters of governance in its hand, the better it would be for the citizens of that country.
He often criticized the government's lack of consideration towards the welfare of the citizens.
He also used the term machine to describe the political apparatus of the government where it sued the 'mass of man' for its own benefits.
A laissez faire form of government would mean relatively lesser power in the hands of the government and more autonomy in the hands of individuals even if restricted to areas of economic interest alone.
To know more about civil disobedience, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28342895
#SPJ4
Gangs exist to provoke fear! Is this a true statement, why or why not?
Gangs are groups of three or more people who come together to form a collective identity and spread fear or intimidation.
What is intimidation?Making someone feel afraid or timid is considered intimidation. This includes actions that are done on purpose to make someone else feel uncomfortable in general, such as humiliation, embarrassment, inferiority, a lack of freedom, etc. The victim may be chosen based on a variety of criteria, including gender, race, class, skin color, competence, knowledge, wealth, temperament, etc. Intimidation is used to coerce cooperation, destabilize/undermine the other person, make them submit (also known as cowing), mask insecurities, elevate oneself in society, and other purposes. The unwelcome behaviors or tools of intimidation, including but not limited to condescending, unpleasant, sarcastic, insulting, patronizing, humiliating, disparaging, etc., would legitimately cause apprehension in the victims and make them fearful of damage or injury, among other things.
To learn about freedom, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29775318
#SPJ1
Who is affected by the Supreme Court decisions?
The Supreme Court's decisions have a huge impact on society as a whole, not just on federal and state courts, but also on schoolchildren in significant ways.
The Supreme Court has a significant impact on how to subordinate federal and state courts, as well as federal and state agencies, implement decisions made by the Court and how they are delayed, avoided, interpreted incorrectly, and overturned.
It includes responses from a variety of "populations," such as:
those who explain or elaborate on its decisions,those who are expected to carry them out or put them into practice, the people for whom the decisions are meant, and the general public.To learn more about Court, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4
Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views?
Answer:
if they use violence or threats especially against a certain person as it can cause emotional stress.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Voicing Unpopular opinions is apart of Everyone's constitutional Right, and isn't prohibited in any way but is limited.
Explanation:
Everyone has the right to voice their opinion, like who they Want to be President, or Samsung vs iPhone, whatever the matter is you have that right, but is limited, you are not allowed (Using your words) to cause a Public disturbance if their is no threat, like you can't call fire in a Movie theater if their is none, or you can't say "GUN" while the President is speaking or threaten some. It's just not allowed, these aren't considered an Opinion, their just disturbances.
What was an important effect of Blackstone?
Option b: Important effect of Blackstone is that Common law became more accessible.
William Blackstone was an 18th-century English jurist, judge, and statesman.
He summarized England common law in an accessible, logical and understandable way. This was done by him writing a commentary on England law.
In 1765 Sir William Blackstone wrote a commentary on English law, published by the Calderón Press, Oxford.
The Commentary is considered a major work in the development of English law and played a role in the development of the American legal system.
To know more about Blackstone, here:
https://brainly.com/question/989835
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
What was an important effect of Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England? People in England no longer had to pay taxes. Common law became more accessible. Judges were able to rule as they pleased. The rights of the accused were done away with.
What are some reasons underlying the requirements that before a person can be convicted of a crime, every member of a jury voted for conviction?
There are several reasons why the requirement that every member of a jury must vote for conviction before a person can be found guilty of a crime is in place:
The requirement for a unanimous verdict helps to ensure that the defendant is not convicted unless there is a high level of agreement among the jurors that they are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. This helps to prevent wrongful convictions and protect the rights of the accused.A unanimous verdict helps to ensure that all jurors have thoroughly considered the evidence and arguments presented during the trial. It requires them to engage in deliberation and come to a consensus about the guilt of the defendant, rather than simply relying on the opinions of a few jurors.A unanimous verdict is more likely to be viewed as fair and legitimate by the general public, as it demonstrates that all jurors were in agreement about the verdict. This can help to maintain public trust in the justice system.The requirement for a unanimous verdict can also help to prevent deadlocks and mistrials, as it ensures that all jurors are in agreement about the verdict before it can be returned.To conclude, the requirement for a unanimous verdict helps to ensure that defendants are not convicted unless there is a high level of agreement among the jurors that they are guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, and helps to protect the rights of the accused and maintain public trust in the justice system.
Hope This Helps You!
If a customer buys a new issue municipal bond at a discount in the primary market, which of the following statements are TRUE?
I. The discount must be accredited
II. The discount may not be accredited
III. At maturity, there is a capital gain
IV. At maturity, there is no capital gain
Option 1&4: If a customer buys a new issue municipal bond at a discount in the primary market, The discount must be accredited and At maturity, there is no capital gain
A discount bond is a bond that is issued at a price below par or trades in the secondary market at a price below par.
They are similar to zero-coupon bonds, except the latter pay no interest until maturity. A bond is said to be trading at a discount if the coupon is lower than the prevailing interest rate.
Bonds may be issued at a discount for the following reasons: Bond Issuer Default Risk, Floating interest rate and Credit check
To learn more about 'Discount bond', here:
https://brainly.com/question/29689720
#SPJ4
Please help I need this for a Law and Order class! will give brainliest for right answer!
(the time this question is referring to is when Hamilton and Madison created political parties.) If you can answer it then at least rephrase the question because I don't understand it.
What impact did the creation of political parties ultimately have on the press?
Answer:
It is often the case in revolutions that many who take a lead role in shaping the new society are not those who instigated a revolution in the first place. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were both too young to be revolutionary instigators (they were just 14 and 10 respectively when the Stamp Act was passed) but by the 1780s they had risen to prominent positions within the new nation. Both would contribute to the Revolutionary War, Madison as a state assemblyman and Hamilton as a soldier, and both would earn selection to the 1787 Philadelphia convention. Each would play a lead role in determining the political make-up of the new nation: Madison as a political philosopher and architect of the Constitution; Hamilton as a forceful advocate for centralised political and economic power. Both were nationalists, envisaging the great potential for the future United States; both were at the forefront of the Federalist movement.
James Madison was physically an unremarkable figure, barely 158 centimetres tall, pale-skinned and sickly looking, with a high-pitched voice that was often inaudible in public meetings and assemblies. He was quite anti-social, disliking company and crowds, though those with whom he did mix described him as an erudite conversationalist. Madison had entered the Virginia assembly in 1776 and proved something of a junior Thomas Jefferson. His hard work and attention to detail earned him considerable respect, despite his young age. Like many of his colleagues, Madison was alarmed at the social disorder permitted by the watery Articles of Confederation, so he eagerly accepted a nomination to attend Philadelphia. There he tabled his famous ‘Virginia Plan’ for a three-branch federal political system, combining existing ideas (such as the British political system and the separation of powers theorised by Montesquieu) with his own innovations, guided by his keen knowledge of political philosophy and his precise attention to detail. Though his model was subsequently amended by the convention, Madison would later earn the epithet ‘father of the Constitution’, though it was a title he spurned. And while he opposed the inclusion of specific individual rights into the Constitution, when this concession was made to the anti-Federalists Madison alone drafted the Bill of Rights. Madison later went on to become the fourth president of the United States between 1809-17.
Explanation:
before a lawsuit begins, the court must have proof that the defendant was notified of the lawsuit.
a. true
b. false
The court must have evidence that the defendant was given notice of the action before it can proceed. (True)
Explain the court.An individual or group of people with the authority to hear and decide disputes involving civil, criminal, ecclesiastical, or military conflicts is known as a court, also referred to as a court of law. Originally only denoting "an enclosed area," the word "court" is today used to describe any room, hallway, building, or other place where legal proceedings are held.
This is about the operation of the judiciary of the government. It looks at some of the key relationships between this branch and the legislative and executive branches as well as the functions, makeup, and management of the judicial system and its most significant personnel, the judges.
To know more about Judiciary, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13242861
#SPJ1
What happens when the Supreme Court rules a law unconstitutional ?
If a law is deemed unconstitutional, the courts can declare it unenforceable, and Congress can repeal the unconstitutional law to avoid confusion or include similar policies to try to achieve its goals.
A new version may choose to replace that law.
The Supreme Court has the power to conduct judicial review whenever Congress proposes new legislation.
During its review, the Supreme Court carefully considers each content of the proposed law. If any part of the content violates the rules laid down in the Constitution, those laws are considered "unconstitutional" and must be amended before they can pass.
To learn more about 'Supreme court', here:
https://brainly.com/question/1755400
#SPJ4
What are the 3 basic principles that Mendel was able to discover about genetics?
Mendel translated the findings of his studies on pea plants into three main principles that define the fundamentals of inheritance in diploid species. They are the independent assortment principle, the dominance principle, and the principle of segregation.
Mendel's Findings
1. The hereditary determinants are of a particulate nature. These determinants are called genes.
2. For each investigated characteristic, a gene pair from each parent is present in each cell. One allele for the dominant phenotype and one for the recessive phenotype are present in the F1 from a cross of two pure lines. The gene pair is made up of these two alleles.
3. Since just one of the gene pair's members segregates into each gamete, each gamete carries only that one gene.
4. Gametes mate randomly, regardless of the other gene pairs that are involved.
For more questions on Mendel's conclusion
https://brainly.com/question/30097040
#SPJ4
Common Law is a term for the laws that are familiar to most of us.
True/False.
Common Law refers to the laws that most of us are familiar with. False.
Common Law is derived from custom or judicial decisions in English and American courts, but it is not the result of legislation. Higher court decisions are not binding on lower courts.
In law, common law (also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law) is the body of law created by judges and other quasi-judicial tribunals through written opinions.
The fact that common law emerges as precedent is what sets it apart. To synthesize the legal principles of previous cases, common law courts look to previous court decisions.The principle of stare decisis, which states that cases should be decided in accordance with consistent principled rules so that similar facts yield similar results, is at the heart of all common law systems.
Learn more about Common Law to visit this link
https://brainly.com/question/13070537
#SPJ4
What is Blackstone known for?
Sir William Blackstone was an English jurist, magistrate, and Tory politician, best known for writing commentaries on England law. William Blackstone made common law records.
He is famous for writing commentaries on English law. His four volumes of papers deal with ``human rights'', ``object rights'', ``private injustices'' and ``public injustices''.
Blackstone intended his work as an examination of common law as it developed in England. His work was also used in early US courts.
William Blackstone was important because he wrote a widely acclaimed commentary on English law that analyzed the strengths and weaknesses of English law.
To know more about 'William Blackstone', here:
https://brainly.com/question/30133255
#SPJ4
At the beginning of a trial, only the defendant's attorney makes an opening statement.
True
False
False. Only the defendant's attorney makes an opening statement at the start of a trial.
Lawyers who represent a defendant in a criminal case are formally known as "criminal defense attorneys." A defense attorney represents the defendant in court in both civil and criminal cases. General lawyers practice law and represent clients in business and other general legal matters. A criminal defense attorney, on the other hand, is an expert in trial tactics and defense strategies required for the client and their family's case to be successfully resolved. Defense Attorneys form relationships with clients by determining their legal needs, providing counsel, and assisting them in understanding their legal options.
Learn more about attorney here:
https://brainly.com/question/28143061
#SPJ4
In a short paragraph, describe the requirements that both city firefighters and wild land firefighters must have
in order to pass the physical conditioning tests.
Firefighters are required to act safely, to look out for others, and to treat everyone equally. Additionally, they must to be aware that lives are at risk.
Describe firefighters.Firefighters are first responders and rescues with a focus on putting out flames. Their main duty is to put out dangerous flames that endanger people's lives, property, and the environment. They might also be necessary to protect animal lives in particular situations or jurisdictions.
The responsibilities of a fireman extend beyond putting out fires. One of the numerous things a fireman does is that. A firefighter assists with hazardous chemicals, traffic accidents, medical emergencies, floods, and even rescues cats from trees in addition to extinguishing fires and defending people from harm.
Sometimes, firefighters who are men known as "firemen" (and, less commonly, a female firefighter as firewoman).
To know more about firefighters visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/28436633
#SPJ1
Which of the following terms is defined as an ideal that embraces all aspects of civilized life? a. criminal justice. b. vigilante justice. c. social justice. d. civil justice.
Ideal term which embraces all aspects of civilized life is social justice. Thus, option C is the answer.
Social justice is defined as an ideal that embraces all aspects of civilized life, encompassing not just the legal system but also the political, economic, and social aspects of society. It is the concept that everyone should have equal rights and opportunities and be treated fairly, regardless of their background or circumstances. This can include issues such as poverty, discrimination, education, healthcare, and more.
Social justice aims to create a more just and equitable society for all, working towards reducing economic and social inequalities and ensuring that everyone has access to the resources and opportunities they need to thrive.
To learn more about Social Justice,
https://brainly.com/question/14573733
The 5% policy applies to:
I. commissions charged when executing customer agency (broker) transactions.
II. riskless and simultaneous transactions.
III. markups on stock sold from inventory.
IV. markdowns on stocks bought for inventory.
The 5% policy applies to the commissions which are charged when executing customer agency (broker) transactions, riskless and simultaneous transactions, and also the markups on stock sold from inventory.
The 5% policy tends to apply to both the commission charges on the agency transactions and also to the markups and the markdowns and also on the principal transactions. This thus includes the riskless principal trades.
However, in 1943, the Association's Board is said to have adopted what has become known as the "5% Policy" which is said to to be applied to the transactions which are thus executed for customers. Thus, the markups on stock is sold from the inventory.
Hence, options I, II, III, and IV are correct.
To learn more about the inventory here:
https://brainly.com/question/14184995
#SPJ4
if Liz Marley acquired a rare stamp as a bequest when her father passed away does it have the same basis
The stamp would have the same basis if Liz acquired it as a bequest from her father when he passed.
What is a bequest?Objects left in a will are known as bequests. In the past, bequest and deviser were terms used to describe real and personal property that was left by will. These days, both terms are utilized. The verb form of the action of bequeathing is called "to bequeath."
Gifts are not always bequests, but bequests are gifts. Making a gift through a will to a close family member is known as a bequest. In a Will, you may write something as straightforward as "I leave my red Corvette to my son." But a gift may also be given without regard to a will.
Read more on bequest here:https://brainly.com/question/14073669
#SPJ1
Which of these is an exception to texas law prohibiting riding in the bed of a truck or trailer?
a. Government sanctioned hayrides
b. On a beach
c. Parades
d. All the choices are correct
The exception to Texas law prohibiting riding in the bed of a truck or trailer is Government-sanctioned hayrides, On a beach, and Parades, i.e Correct response is D- all above.
Operating an open-bed pickup truck or open flatbed truck in Texas with a child under the age of 18 in the truck's bed or trailer is a misdemeanour traffic infraction.
If you are found guilty, you could be subject to a fine of $25 to $200.
Texas legislators have passed traffic regulations aimed at protecting the safety of the general driving populace.
For instance, safety belts save thousands of lives each year. The purpose of speed limits is to deliver cars to their destinations safely and quickly.
Conversations on the phone and texting while driving are both hazardous diversions. Roadways are made safe by using traffic signals like flashing yellow lights and road signage.
To learn more about Traffic, Click here:
https://brainly.com/question/8890043
#SPJ4
What is a local law called?
Answer:
Local laws are called ordinances
“Boundary fence question” if a shed wall is on the boundary line and a fence is built, as close to the shed as possible. Is the fence line after 15 years taken as the new boundary line In adverse possession law (I live in Victoria, Australia.)?
Answer:
In Victoria, Australia, according to the law of adverse possession, a fence line cannot be taken as the new boundary line after 15 years. The boundary line remains the same as it was before the fence was built.
Explanation:
Define Assault. Define battery Law Class help please.
Answer:
Assault and battery exists in both the tort law context and the criminal law context. ... In an act of physical violence, assault refers to the act which causes the victim to apprehend imminent physical harm, while battery refers to the actual act causing the physical harm.
Does this help?
Which case is an example of violating an individual’s Fourth Amendment protections?
A police officer comes into your house when you are not home and searches your computer.
A law enforcement agency has a warrant to search your records on the email provider’s server.
You invite a police officer into your home to search and she asks for your email password.
A judge issues a warrant to search your work computer when you are not in the office.
Answer:
A police officer comes into your house when you are not home and searches your computer.
Explanation:
No warrant; no permission
What are some of the policy reasons underlying the requirement that before a person can be convicted of a crime, every member of a jury votes for conviction?
The prosecution must establish the defendant's guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt. This assures that there is reasonable even if they cannot all come to an agreement. every member of a jury votes conviction.
What justifications does Juror 8 make for their initial verdict of not guilty?Juror 8 is the only one who cast a "not guilty" vote in the first round. He does this for a different purpose than whether or not he truly believes the accused is innocent. He casts his vote for not guilty because he thinks the committee ought to deliberate before making a decision in a case with such grave repercussions.
How many jurors must find the defendant guilty in order for a conviction to occur?A three-fourths vote is necessary in cases involving mandatory life sentences or prison terms of more than ten years. In every other To find someone guilty, just a two-thirds majority is needed.
To know more about jury votes conviction visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/19634487
#SPJ1
what type of court has original jurisdiction over a case involving an american suing a citizen of another contry
Federal courts are the courts of primary jurisdiction in cases where Americans are suing citizens of other countries.
Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction. This means that federal courts can hear only cases authorized by the U.S.
Constitution or federal law.
The federal district courts are the point of contact for all litigation arising under federal law, the Constitution, or international treaties. This form of jurisdiction is called an "original jurisdiction".
The jurisdiction of the state courts may overlap with the jurisdiction of the federal courts, which means that in some cases both courts will hear the case.
Jurisdiction of the courts includes cases of the United States government, constitutional law, federal law, and interstate disputes.
Therefore, jurisdiction of origin also exists when an American is suing a citizen of another country.
To learn more about ‘Federal court’, here:
https://brainly.com/question/1384353
#SPJ4
the part of the constitution that describes the legislative branch is?
Answer:
Article One of the United States Constitution.
Explanation:
In the United States constitution is marks the Legislative branch of the Government which consist a bicameral branch of the Government, the Upper level the Senate, and the Lower Level the House of Representatives, it also establishes the speaker role, who heads the senate, and the qualifications of someone to take a particular legislative office.