Calvin Coolidge believe business was the chief business of the American people.
The correct option is d.
The 30th president of the United States, John Calvin Coolidge Jr., was an American politician and attorney who presided over the country from 1923 to 1929. Coolidge, a Republican lawyer from New England who was born in Vermont, rose through the ranks of Massachusetts state politics before taking office as governor. He gained a reputation as a man of decisive action thanks to his response to the 1919 Boston Police Strike, which catapulted him into the national spotlight.
Coolidge was steadfast in his pursuit of an effective and cost-effective government. Calvin Coolidge, the 30th President of the United States (1923–1929), showed his commitment to upholding the traditional moral and economic values of thriftiness despite the material prosperity that many Americans were experiencing in the 1920s. Therefore, the correct option is d.
The question is incomplete the complete question is "What did Calvin Coolidge believe was the chief business of the American people?
a) Civil rights. b) Internationalism. c) Spreading liberty. d) Business. e) Going to church."
Learn more about business at:
brainly.com/question/15826771
#SPJ4
The Allied invasion of ______ was given the code name D-Day.
Answer:
Nazi-occupied Europe is the answer.
Explanation:
to justify american intervention in the venezuela boundary dispute with britain, secretary of state olney invoked the
To justify American intervention in the Venezuela boundary dispute with Britain, Secretary of State Olney invoked the Monroe Doctrine.
What is the Monroe Doctrine?The Monroe Doctrine was established by the United States in 1823. It was an international policy aimed at avoiding European colonialism in the Americas.
The doctrine, which was first introduced by President James Monroe in his seventh annual message to Congress in 1823, stated that the United States would not meddle in European affairs and that Europe should not meddle in American affairs.
European interference in the Americas, according to the Monroe Doctrine, would be viewed as a threat to the security of the United States. As a result, the United States pledged to protect the newly independent nations in the Americas.
Furthermore, the doctrine aimed to promote peace and stability in the region, which would also benefit the United States.
What is the Venezuela boundary dispute?The Venezuela boundary dispute arose in 1895 between Great Britain and Venezuela. The dispute was over the border separating British Guiana from Venezuela. Venezuela disputed the border and claimed a large portion of British Guiana.
The British, on the other hand, rejected the claim and stated that the border had already been established by treaty. The issue of ownership remained unresolved for a long time.
What was the justification for American intervention?Secretary of State Olney, in an effort to resolve the Venezuela boundary dispute, used the Monroe Doctrine as a basis for American intervention. He argued that the United States was justified in intervening in the dispute because it affected the United States' security interests.
Britain's presence in the Western Hemisphere, according to Olney, threatened American security. As a result, he stated that the United States was authorized to use force to protect its security interests under the Monroe Doctrine.
To know more about Monroe Doctrine, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30723899#
#SPJ11
According to the Emergency Nurses Association position statement on forensic evidence collection, which action should emergency nurses perform?
A. Serve as arbitrators for the victims of violent crime.
B. Delegate evidence collection to law enforcement personnel.
C. Act as expert witnesses in legal proceedings.
D. Work with other professionals to develop the guidelines for forensic evidence collection.
According to the Emergency Nurses Association position statement on forensic evidence collection, emergency nurses should delegate evidence collection to law enforcement personnel. The answer is option B.
What is the Emergency Nurses Association?The Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) is the premier professional nursing organization dedicated to defining the future of emergency nursing and emergency care through advocacy, expertise, innovation, and leadership. The ENA has more than 50,000 members and is a specialty nursing organization that helps to provide leadership in the practice of emergency nursing.
What action should emergency nurses perform?Emergency nurses should delegate evidence collection to law enforcement personnel according to the Emergency Nurses Association position statement on forensic evidence collection. The role of the emergency nurse in forensic evidence collection is to identify and collect physical evidence that may be useful in criminal investigations.
However, because forensic evidence collection can be a complex process that requires specialized skills and training, it is recommended that nurses delegate this responsibility to law enforcement personnel who have the necessary expertise and training to collect and preserve evidence in a way that is admissible in court.
Thus, option B is the correct option.
To know more about forensic evidence, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/15902971#
#SPJ11
Read this quotation from Pericles’s Funeral Oration in ancient Athens. It is true that we are called a democracy, because power is in the hands of the many and not the few. . . Everyone is equal before the law; when a citizen is in any way distinguished, he is chosen for public service, not as a matter of privilege, but as reward for his abilities. Neither is poverty an obstacle; a man may benefit his country whatever his social class. This quotation supports the idea that
the ability to govern should be a privilege. Few citizens have the skills for public service. Women and men should be equal under the law. Both the rich and the poor have the ability to serve
This quotation from Pericles's Funeral Oration supports the idea that women and men should be equal under the law.
Pericles emphasised that everyone in Athens is treated equally under the law and that a citizen's qualifications for public duty are determined by their skills, not by their social standing. He makes the point directly that "Neither is poverty a hindrance; a man may benefit his country whatever his social class," implying that social status shouldn't restrict a person from serving their country. Its emphasis on equal protection under the law and everyone's capacity to contribute to society, regardless of their socioeconomic standing, signifies a rejection of the notion that having the power to govern should be a privilege reserved for the select few who are judged deserving.
To know more about Pericles's Funeral Oration
brainly.com/question/30243323
#SPJ4
Which of the following individuals and groups most directly supported the perspective of this cartoon?
Herbert Hoover and East Coast leaders of the Republican Party.
Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters.
American men who were eligible for the military draft.
Wendell Willkie and the progressive wing of the Republican Party.
The individuals and groups most directly supported the perspective of this cartoon is charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters. The correct option is B. charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters.
This was a popular sentiment that spread throughout the country. The given cartoon was drawn in 1940 and the cartoonist's message is that the proposed peacetime draft was a conspiracy by American industry and Great Britain to trick the United States into joining World War II.
Lindbergh said that the United States had no business being involved in the war and that it should remain neutral. He went on to say that the war was being promoted by Jews and that they were using it to enrich themselves at the expense of the United States. Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters were against the draft.
They saw it as an infringement on personal liberties and thought that it would lead to more war. They were also against the idea of fighting for other countries, as they felt that the United States should focus on its own problems. Overall, Charles Lindbergh and Midwest and rural newspapers and voters were against the draft, and they most directly supported the perspective of the cartoon.
For more about perspective:
https://brainly.com/question/28272722
#SPJ11
Literary realism was a response to and rejection of the dominant scientific ideas of the eighteenth century
By emphasising the objective portrayal of daily life and the human experience rather than idealised or romanticised portrayals, literary realism developed as a rejection of the dominant scientific concepts.
Did the 18th century inspire literary realism from its inception?The realist art movement, which got its start in France in the nineteenth century and persisted through the early twentieth, includes literary realism. It got its start as a response to Romanticism in the eighteenth century and the emergence of the bourgeoisie in Europe.
What did the 18th century mean by literary realism?Realism. The eighteenth-century novel's emphasis on realism and the accurate portrayal of society is one of its main criticisms. Generally speaking, the phrase "realism" refers to the true portrayal of the ordinary life of a place or period in a literarily work.
To know more about literary visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/11827679
#SPJ9
how did the participation of married women and unmarried women in the industrial workforce differ in the early 1800s?
In the early 19th century, women's participation in the industrial labor force was influenced by their marital status, i.e., whether they were married or single.
In the early 1800s, married women and unmarried women participated in the industrial workforce in different ways.
Married women were limited in the types of work they could do, whereas unmarried women had more opportunities. Unmarried women could take on jobs that were considered to be more physically demanding and labor-intensive than those open to married women. Additionally, unmarried women were typically able to make higher wages than married women.However, as industrialization progressed, job opportunities for married women also increased. Some factories began to offer day care and other benefits for workers with children, which allowed more married women to enter the labor market.
In conclusion, the participation of married and unmarried women in the industrial labor force in the early nineteenth century was strongly influenced by cultural expectations and family responsibilities.
Learn More About Women in the 19th century
https://brainly.com/question/2477956
#SPJ11
How does the author describe the attention paid to women's fashion throughout history?
The author described the attention paid to women's fashion throughout history by emphasizing how far the acceptance for women's fashion has come.
How has women's fashion evolve over the century?Over the course of the past century, women's fashion has undergone a multitude of changes and transformations, reflecting broader social and cultural shifts. Beginning with the restrictive and constrictive styles of the early 1900s, such as corsets and long skirts, fashion gradually evolved into more relaxed and practical designs, such as the flapper dresses of the 1920s and the streamlined styles of the 1930s.
The 1940s saw utilitarian designs emerge as a result of wartime austerity, while the 1950s ushered in a return to more feminine and glamorous styles. The 1960s brought a period of experimentation and revolution, with mod styles and psychedelic prints, followed by the bohemian and hippie trends of the 1970s. The 1980s and 1990s were marked by bold and eclectic styles, from power suits to grunge fashion. Today, women's fashion continues to evolve, with an emphasis on sustainability, inclusivity, and individual expression.
Read more about women's fashion
brainly.com/question/30553649
#SPJ1
Adolf Hitler became the leader of the ? Party in Germany.
Answer:
Nazi party
Explanation:
1. draw inferences why did congress fail in its attempts to force britain and france to recognize american neutrality?
Congress failed in its attempts to force Britain and France to recognize American neutrality because they were weak and lacked the power to enforce their laws. This is evident from the fact that the United States was still a relatively new nation and did not have a strong military or economic base.
Additionally, the British and French had their own interests to protect, and did not see any benefits in recognizing American neutrality.
Furthermore, the British and French had their own naval blockades and wanted to maintain their dominance in the region. As a result, they did not feel compelled to recognize American neutrality, and continued to take actions that went against American interests.
Overall, Congress failed in its attempts to force Britain and France to recognize American neutrality due to their own weaknesses, lack of power, and inability to influence the actions of foreign nations.
To know more about economic base refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31087117#
#SPJ11
You are the leader of a country. If your ally is attacked, do you think your country would become involved in the conflict? Why or why not?
Answer:
For example The NATO
What happens if a country a member country of NATO is attacked?
The NATO Alliance consists of 30 member states from North America and Europe. Article Five of the treaty states that if an armed attack occurs against one of the member states, it should be considered an attack against all members, and other members shall assist the attacked member, with armed forces if necessary.
Explanation:
identify monroe's foreign policy. what were the four main points of the monroe doctrine? what was its impact?
Monroe's foreign policy is commonly referred to as the Monroe Doctrine.
This was a United States policy that declared any attempt by a European nation to colonize, interfere with, or exert control over any nation in the Americas would be viewed as a hostile act against the United States.
The four main points of the Monroe Doctrine are as follows:
1. The United States would not interfere in the affairs of European nations.
2. European nations could no longer establish new colonies in the Americas.
3. Any attempt by a European nation to colonize or interfere with nations in the Americas would be considered a hostile act against the United States.
4. The United States would refrain from interfering in existing European colonies in the Americas.
Impact of Monroe Doctrine:
The Monroe Doctrine had a significant impact on the Western Hemisphere, particularly in Latin America. It enabled the United States to solidify its influence over the hemisphere and ensured that no other nation would be able to intervene in the Americas.
It also helped to establish the United States as a world power and paved the way for further territorial expansion.
To know more about Monroe Doctrine, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30723899#
#SPJ11
Which person said, "If it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice... I say, let it be done"?
Answer:
Which person said, "If it is deemed necessary that I should forfeit my life for the furtherance of the ends of justice... I say, let it be done"?
John BrownExplanation:
You're welcome.
What kind of action did Martin Luther King, Jr., advocate in order to protest to unjust laws referenced in the passage?
A) vote for civil rights leaders
B) violent protest
C) boycott
D) civil disobedience
Martin Luther King, Jr.
"The answer is found in the fact that there are two types of laws: there are just laws, and there are unjust laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that, 'An unjust law is no law at all.'
Now, what is the difference between the two? How does one determine when a law is just or unjust? A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law, or the law of God. An unjust law is a code that is out of harmony with the moral law. To put it in the terms of St. Thomas Aquinas, an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal and natural law. Any law that uplifts human personality is just. Any law that degrades human personality is unjust.
- excerpt from "Letter from a Birmingham Jail" written by Martin Luther King jr. in 1963 after being arrested for leading a protest
Martin Luther King, Jr. encouraged civil disobedience as a form of protest against the unfair policies mentioned in the paragraph.
What types of protests were associated with Martin Luther King Jr.He was the driving force behind significant events like the Montgomery Bus Boycott and the 1963 March on Washington, which contributed to the passage of the Voting Rights Act and the Civil Rights Act, among other crucial pieces of legislation.
Which techniques did Martin Luther King Jr. employ?Martin Luther King, Jr. used the strength of words and nonviolent actions of resistance, such protests, grassroots organising, and civil disobedience, to achieve goals that seemed unattainable at a time when some were promoting the use of "all means necessary," even force, to achieve independence.
To know more about civil disobedience visit:-
https://brainly.com/question/342503
#SPJ1
Laissez-faire economics and antitrust acts were:
A.
hallmarks of the Populist Party platform.
B.
vocally supported by the robber barons.
C.
unlikely to be supported by the same person.
D.
designed to rein in businesses that grew too large.
The Populist Party's agenda was characterized by laissez-faire economics and antitrust laws.
Mercantilism or capitalism best describes laissez-faire?There was little to no competition during mercantilism because the government controlled the means of production. The concept of inter-individual and inter-corporate competition was introduced by laissez-faire capitalism.
What made free-market economics so crucial?Because it gives people the most incentive to build money, laissez faire is the economic policy that grows the economy the fastest. You can't put on a robe, a crown, and demand that people give you money under a laissez-faire capitalist system.
To know more about laissez-faire visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/8284490
#SPJ1
in 1975 the education of all handicapped children act stipulated that children with special needs must be educated in the:
In 1975, the Education of All Handicapped Children Act established that children with special needs should be educated in the “least restrictive environment” possible, meaning they should be integrated into regular classrooms to the maximum extent possible without negatively affecting their education.
This Act was passed to ensure that all children, regardless of their disabilities, have access to a free and appropriate public education. The Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EAHCA) of 1975 was signed into law by President Gerald Ford. The law aimed to provide equal educational opportunities for children with disabilities. This act is now known as the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).
IDEA mandates that children with disabilities be educated in the least restrictive environment (LRE) that is appropriate for their educational needs. That means that students with disabilities are not placed in special education classrooms unless it is necessary. Students with disabilities must be placed in the same classrooms as their peers to the maximum extent possible. If a student with disabilities cannot receive an appropriate education in a general classroom, IDEA provides for a range of alternative placements.
These alternative placements include: separate classrooms, schools for students with disabilities, residential facilities, and home instruction. IDEA also requires that schools provide related services, such as physical therapy or counseling, to students with disabilities that need them. In conclusion, in 1975 the Education of All Handicapped Children Act established that children with special needs should be educated in the least restrictive environment possible.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act mandates that children with disabilities be educated in the least restrictive environment that is appropriate for their educational needs. If a student with disabilities cannot receive an appropriate education in a general classroom, IDEA provides for a range of alternative placements.
To learn more about EAHCA here:
https://brainly.com/question/29492211
#SPJ11
Your report should consist of three concise
paragraphs that use information from the primary
sources and that:
1. describe Hitler.
2. assess his character.
3. make recommendations to the United States
about how to respond to Hitler in the future.
The report about Hitler is as follows: Hitler was a German politician and leader of the Nazi Party, rising to power as Chancellor in 1933 and later becoming the Führer in 1934.
What is the report about?Hitler was born in Austria and served in the German Army during World War I. Hitler was known for his extreme nationalist, racist, and anti-Semitic views. He believed in the superiority of the Aryan race and sought to expand German territory and influence through military conquest.
Hitler's character was marked by his unwavering commitment to his ideology, his ruthless ambition, and his willingness to use violence to achieve his goals. He was charismatic and skilled at public speaking, able to rally his supporters with fiery speeches. However, he was also paranoid, cruel, and prone to irrational decision-making. He saw himself as a genius and often disregarded the advice of his advisors.
To respond to Hitler in the future, the United States should take a firm stance against his aggressive actions and expansionist policies. The U.S. should work with its allies to contain German aggression and prevent further military conquests. Diplomacy should be used where possible, but the U.S. should be prepared to use military force if necessary to protect the interests of its allies and ensure global stability. Also, efforts should be made to counter Hitler's propaganda and discredit his extremist ideology.
Learn more about Hitler at:
https://brainly.com/question/12778492
#SPJ1
cold war geopolitics inspired the united states to support the coup of democratically-elected leaders in which two south asian countries? (2 right answers)
During the Cold War, the United States adopted a containment policy against communism, which led to its intervention in various countries around the world to prevent the expansion of the Soviet bloc. In South Asia, the United States supported the coup of democratically elected leaders in two countries: Iran and Pakistan.
In Iran in 1953, the United States, together with the United Kingdom, orchestrated a coup against the democratically elected prime minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, who had nationalized the country's oil industry.In Pakistan in 1977, the United States supported the military coup led by General Mohammad Zia-ul-Haq against the democratically elected prime minister, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto.In conclusion, the geopolitics of the Cold War led the United States to intervene in various countries of the world to prevent the spread of communism.
Lear More About Cold War
https://brainly.com/question/856013
#SPJ11
Which type of government did Nigeria, Mali, and Mauritania each establish
immediately after winning independence from colonial powers?
A. Military dictatorships
B. Representative democracies
C. Islamic theocracies
D. Constitutional monarchies
After winning indepence, the government did Nigeria, Mali, and Mauritania each establish Military dictatorships. Option A
What is the type of government did Nigeria, Mali, and Mauritania each establish immediately after winning independence from colonial powersAfter gaining independence from colonial powers, Nigeria, Mali, and Mauritania each established representative democracies as their form of government.
However, all three countries experienced varying degrees of instability, including military coups and civil wars, in the years following their independence.
Learn more about Military dictatorships at https://brainly.com/question/30883467
#SPJ1
How did the axis leaders come to power in their own countries
These countries were led by German dictator Adolf Hitler, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini and Japanese Emperor Hirohito. In September 1940, the three countries formalized their alliance through the Tripartite Pact. Five other countries subsequently joined the Tripartite Pact and became Axis powers.
between 1879 and 1880, an estimated 40,000-60,000 african-americans migrated to group of answer choices massachusetts. south carolina. california. kansas.
Answer: Kansas
Explanation: Hope this helps
explain how vairous enviormental factors contribuyted to development of vaired patterns of migration from 1750 and 1900
The environmental factors that contributed to the development of varied patterns of migration from 1750 to 1900 include food availability, population pressures, and climate change.
Food availability was a key factor in migration patterns during this period, as areas with abundant food sources often saw increases in migration.
Population pressures such as overcrowding and a lack of resources also played a role, as many people sought more fertile lands.
Climate change also affected migration patterns during this period, as it caused a shift in temperatures, which affected crop yields and encouraged people to seek areas with more favorable climates.
All of these factors combined to create a diverse pattern of migration from 1750 to 1900.
To know more about migration patterns click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/30010897#
#SPJ11
who wrote the secondary accounts of the first vision, and what unique information does each of these accounts give us?
The secondary accounts of the First Vision were written by Joseph Smith and his scribes. The four primary accounts were written by Joseph Smith himself, with three of them being the most important ones: the 1832 account, the 1835 account, and the 1842 account. The fourth one is the 1843 Wentworth Letter.
Each of these accounts gives us unique information about the First Vision. Here is what each of them says:
The 1832 account - This is the earliest known account of the First Vision. It was written by Joseph Smith in his journal in 1832. In this account, Joseph describes how he went to a grove of trees to pray and saw two personages (later identified as Heavenly Father and Jesus Christ) standing above him in the air.
Joseph then asks them which church he should join, and they tell him not to join any of them. This account also includes Joseph's feelings of guilt and despair before the vision. The 1835 account - This account was recorded by Joseph Smith's scribe, Warren Parrish, in Joseph's journal.
It was written while Joseph was preparing for a visit from a newspaper editor named Robert Foster. In this account, Joseph describes seeing an angel before he saw the Father and the Son. This angel told him that his sins were forgiven and that he would become a prophet.
Joseph also describes how the Father and the Son appeared to him and spoke to him. He repeats the idea that he was told not to join any of the churches. The 1842 account - This account was written by Joseph Smith in his own handwriting for a Chicago newspaper editor named John Wentworth.
It is the most well-known account of the First Vision. In this account, Joseph describes seeing two personages who called him by name and told him that his sins were forgiven. They then said that there was no true church on the earth and that Joseph was chosen to restore it.
This account includes Joseph's explanation of why he had the vision and how it relates to the Restoration of the Gospel. The 1843 Wentworth Letter - This account was written by Joseph Smith for a newspaper editor named John Wentworth.
In this account, Joseph repeats much of what he said in the 1842 account, but he also includes a brief history of his life and the Church up to that point. He describes the coming forth of the Book of Mormon and the early persecution of the Church.
To know more about accounts refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29108212#
#SPJ11
PLEASE HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLYEST
using the information from this table and what you learned in this lesson, you will now write an essay in response to this question Which program did the most to expand opportunity for the target group of Americans it was designed to help?
Answer:
In the history of the United States, several programs have been implemented with the aim of expanding opportunities for specific groups of Americans. However, among these programs, the GI Bill of Rights has been the most successful in achieving its objectives. The GI Bill of Rights was designed to assist military personnel who served during World War II to acquire education and training, access affordable loans, and purchase homes. This essay explores how the GI Bill of Rights expanded opportunities for its target group of Americans.
The GI Bill of Rights provided military personnel with the opportunity to access education and training. Under this program, veterans could pursue college education or attend vocational schools, providing them with the necessary knowledge and skills to compete in the job market. According to a report by the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, about 8 million veterans received education and training through the GI Bill of Rights (n.d.). This education and training created a highly skilled workforce that could easily fit in various industries, expanding the employment opportunities for veterans.
The GI Bill of Rights also provided affordable loans to veterans to purchase homes, farms, or start businesses. This provision helped veterans to become homeowners, a crucial step towards achieving the American dream. Through this program, veterans could access affordable loans, and the government would guarantee 50% of the loan amount, reducing the risk for lenders. According to a report by the National Bureau of Economic Research, the GI Bill of Rights helped veterans purchase 2.4 million homes by 1951 (Hansen, 2014). The provision of affordable loans enabled veterans to acquire property, establish businesses, and create wealth, expanding opportunities for them and their families.
Finally, the GI Bill of Rights also provided a range of benefits to the surviving spouses and dependents of military personnel. Under this program, surviving spouses and dependents could access education and training, access affordable loans, and access medical care. This provision enabled spouses and dependents to acquire education and training, which could help them become more competitive in the job market. Moreover, the provision of medical care helped to improve their health, thus improving their quality of life. According to the United States Department of Veterans Affairs, about 540,000 spouses and dependents received education and training benefits from the GI Bill of Rights (n.d.). This provision expanded opportunities for spouses and dependents and created a more equitable society.
In conclusion, the GI Bill of Rights has been the most successful program in expanding opportunities for its target group of Americans. This program provided education and training, affordable loans, and benefits to surviving spouses and dependents. These provisions enabled veterans to acquire skills and knowledge, access affordable loans, purchase homes, and create businesses, creating wealth and expanding opportunities for them and their families. Moreover, the GI Bill of Rights created a highly skilled workforce, expanded the job market, and created a more equitable society.
according to the introduction, the conservationist movement inspired a desire to keep in touch with nature and preserve ancient practical skills. at the end of the 19th century, this led to the development of what?
At the end of the 19th century, this led to the development of Conservation-themed publications (like Forest and Stream) The first US national wilderness park (Yellowstone) Conservation-themed clubs (like the Sierra Club).
The conservation movement, otherwise called nature preservation, is a political, ecological, and social development that tries to oversee and safeguard regular assets, including creatures, growth, and plant species as well as their territory for what's to come.
Conservation is viewed as contrasting from environmentalism and it is for the most part a moderate way of thinking which intends to save regular assets explicitly for their proceeded with reasonable use by people. preservation tries to utilize high-quality scientific evidence to put forth protection attempts more successfully.
Learn more about conservationist:
https://brainly.com/question/29696221
#SPJ4
QUICK!! how was the compromise of 1850 different from the Missouri Compromise?
A. it greatly favored plantation farmers over factory workers.
B. it was designed to protect the rights of african americans
C. it gave new states the choice to accept or reject slavery
D. it attempted to give free states more power than slaves
The compromise of 1850 was different from the Missouri Compromise because it gave new states the choice to accept or reject slavery. The Option C is correct.
How was compromise of 1850 different from Missouri Compromise ?The Compromise of 1850 and the Missouri Compromise were both legislative acts aimed at addressing the issue of slavery in the United States, but they differed in several key ways.
The Missouri Compromise of 1820 sought to maintain a balance between slave and free states by admitting Missouri as a slave state and Maine as a free state, and prohibiting slavery in the rest of the Louisiana Territory north of the 36°30' parallel.
The Compromise of 1850, on the other hand, aimed to resolve the question of whether to allow slavery in the newly acquired territories from the Mexican-American War. It admitted California as a free state, abolished the slave trade (but not slavery itself) in Washington D.C., and introduced a more stringent Fugitive Slave Act.
Read more about compromise of 1850
brainly.com/question/8165267
#SPJ1
Question:
Cecilius Calvert, the founding father of Maryland, was also known as
Cecilius Calvert, the founding father of Maryland, was also known as Lord Baltimore.
Who was Cecilius Calvert?The title of "Lord Baltimore" was inherited by Cecilius Calvert from his father, George Calvert, who had been granted a royal charter by King Charles I to establish a colony in the Chesapeake Bay region of North America. George Calvert had been named "Baron Baltimore" in recognition of his efforts to establish the colony, and after his death, the title passed to his son, Cecilius.
As Lord Baltimore, Cecilius Calvert was responsible for overseeing the establishment and development of the colony of Maryland, which was founded in 1634.
Find out more on Cecilius Calvert at https://brainly.com/question/14343498
#SPJ1
the influence of sea power upon history was written by a. senator albert beveridge. b. henry c. lodge. c. alfred t. mahan. d. theodore roosevelt.
The "Influence of Sea Power Upon History" was written by (c) Alfred T. Mahan.
Let us know a little about the importance of sea power in history:
Sea power played a crucial role in history. In the time of war, the importance of sea power became even more important. It was the most important element for winning the war. Wars can be won and lost at sea. The importance of sea power is the subject of the book "The Influence of Sea Power Upon History," by Alfred Thayer Mahan.
In this book, he wrote about the relationship between sea power and history. The book focuses on the role of sea power in the United States' rise to power. Here, Mahan explains that sea power is the most crucial factor in determining the outcome of a war. He also explains that sea power is essential for the development of a nation. The book was written in 1890, and it was an instant success. It was translated into several languages, and it became one of the most important books on naval strategy. It had a significant impact on the development of naval strategy in the United States and other countries. It was a vital book for policymakers and military leaders who wanted to understand the importance of sea power in history. Hence, the "Influence of Sea Power Upon History" was written by (c) Alfred T. Mahan.
To know more about Sea Power refer: https://brainly.com/question/30755081
#SPJ11
How did the Great Schism affect European society?
Answer:
The Great Schism, also known as the East-West Schism, was a major split within the Christian Church that occurred in 1054. It had significant effects on European society, both religiously and politically.
Religiously, the Great Schism caused a permanent division between the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church. The two churches had already been growing apart for centuries, due to differences in language, culture, and theological beliefs. However, the final split was triggered by a dispute over the use of unleavened bread in the Eucharist, as well as issues related to the authority of the pope and the patriarch of Constantinople.
Politically, the Great Schism led to the formation of two rival power blocs in Europe. The Roman Catholic Church became closely associated with the Holy Roman Empire, which was the dominant political entity in western Europe. Meanwhile, the Eastern Orthodox Church became associated with the Byzantine Empire, which was the dominant power in eastern Europe and the Middle East.
The split also had cultural and economic impacts. For example, the Eastern Orthodox Church developed its own distinct art, music, and liturgical traditions, which differed from those of the Roman Catholic Church. Additionally, trade between eastern and western Europe was disrupted, as the two regions became more culturally and politically separated.
Overall, the Great Schism had a significant impact on European society, contributing to the development of distinct religious, political, cultural, and economic spheres in the east and west.
to what extent did fdr's critics offer reasonable alternatives to the new deal? how did fdr outmaneuver his opponents?\
FDR's critics did not offer any reasonable alternatives to the New Deal. To outmaneuver his opponents, FDR used his power as president to win the support of the media, Congress, and the American people.
They simply opposed FDR's New Deal, arguing that it was excessive in terms of government intervention and spending. Many of the New Deal's critics believed that the government should not intervene in the economy and that the free market should be allowed to operate without government interference.
In response to his opponents, FDR used his communication skills to persuade the American people that his policies were beneficial to the nation.
To outmaneuver his opponents, FDR used his power as president to win the support of the media, Congress, and the American people. He was able to create an image of himself as a strong and determined leader who could guide the nation through difficult times.
In addition, FDR was able to convince Congress to pass several important pieces of legislation that were critical to the success of the New Deal. These included the National Industrial Recovery Act, the Social Security Act, and the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Through these policies, FDR was able to provide relief to those who were suffering as a result of the Great Depression and to establish a safety net that would protect American workers and families for decades to come.
In conclusion, FDR's critics did not offer any reasonable alternatives to the New Deal.
They simply opposed his policies without providing any meaningful solutions to the problems facing the nation. FDR, on the other hand, was able to use his communication skills and his power as president to outmaneuver his opponents and to implement policies that helped to bring the country out of the Great Depression.
To know more about FDR, click on the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/819834#
#SPJ11