Answer:
It is often the case in revolutions that many who take a lead role in shaping the new society are not those who instigated a revolution in the first place. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were both too young to be revolutionary instigators (they were just 14 and 10 respectively when the Stamp Act was passed) but by the 1780s they had risen to prominent positions within the new nation. Both would contribute to the Revolutionary War, Madison as a state assemblyman and Hamilton as a soldier, and both would earn selection to the 1787 Philadelphia convention. Each would play a lead role in determining the political make-up of the new nation: Madison as a political philosopher and architect of the Constitution; Hamilton as a forceful advocate for centralised political and economic power. Both were nationalists, envisaging the great potential for the future United States; both were at the forefront of the Federalist movement.
James Madison was physically an unremarkable figure, barely 158 centimetres tall, pale-skinned and sickly looking, with a high-pitched voice that was often inaudible in public meetings and assemblies. He was quite anti-social, disliking company and crowds, though those with whom he did mix described him as an erudite conversationalist. Madison had entered the Virginia assembly in 1776 and proved something of a junior Thomas Jefferson. His hard work and attention to detail earned him considerable respect, despite his young age. Like many of his colleagues, Madison was alarmed at the social disorder permitted by the watery Articles of Confederation, so he eagerly accepted a nomination to attend Philadelphia. There he tabled his famous ‘Virginia Plan’ for a three-branch federal political system, combining existing ideas (such as the British political system and the separation of powers theorised by Montesquieu) with his own innovations, guided by his keen knowledge of political philosophy and his precise attention to detail. Though his model was subsequently amended by the convention, Madison would later earn the epithet ‘father of the Constitution’, though it was a title he spurned. And while he opposed the inclusion of specific individual rights into the Constitution, when this concession was made to the anti-Federalists Madison alone drafted the Bill of Rights. Madison later went on to become the fourth president of the United States between 1809-17.
Explanation:
A crime considered so heinous that it is punishable by death referred to as:
a. Capital offense
b. Death penalty crime
c. Eye-for-an-eye offense
d. Felony crime.
a successful defense releases the defendant from partial or full liability for a tortious act.
a. true
b. false
A successful defense absolves the defendant of partial or total liability for a tortious act committed.
A term used to describe tortious behavior. Tortious behavior is thus defined as any behavior (other than breach of contract) that can be sued for as a civil wrong. Tort liability means that someone is held responsible for wrongdoing (other than under contract.). Torts are associated with civil court claims. It is a branch of English common law intended to right a wrong (violation of common law, social norms, or civil law) without resorting to criminal punishment. Tortious liability is the liability of the state for the tortious acts of its servants. Tortious liability is the liability of the state for the acts of omission and commission, voluntary or involuntary, and brings it before a court of law.
Learn more about tortious here:
https://brainly.com/question/29312384
#SPJ4
What were the difficulties with the Articles of Confederation?
All problems with federal law are related to insufficient central government power and too much power to the states.
The difficulties were as follows-
- The state did not act immediately.
- The central government was designed to be very weak.
- In the Legislative Assembly had only one House, and in each state he had only one vote.
- Congress needed nine of her 13 states to pass the bill.
- It was virtually impossible to change the documentation.
- Congress did not have the power to enforce that law.
- Congress had no taxing authority.
- Congress had no power to regulate trade.
- There is no national court system “judiciary”.
- Unanimous consent is required to amend the Articles of Incorporation.
To learn more about the article of confederation, here:
https://brainly.com/question/13608970
#SPJ4
How does the use of the word twitches in the stage direction?
Option b: Death is a difficult subject for Mr. Hale, emphasizing the fact that it makes him uncomfortable.
Trifles examines identity issues by excluding the physicality of the central character, Mrs. Wright, from the stage. By taking that character off the stage, Glaspell shows how a person's identity was "innately created."
On-stage characters examine and discuss Mrs. Wright's personal life and her alleged crimes, allowing the audience to form an opinion about her. light.
The themes of the play revolve around sexism and oppression. Sheriffs and other men look down on women and say that men take care of the really important things and take care of the little things.
It is clear that his biased experts are already holding him back. But he acts like he's "on duty," so you could say he's at least trying to look professional.
To learn more about 'Trifles', here:
https://brainly.com/question/29618269
#SPJ4
Complete Question:
Read the excerpt from part one of Trifles.
HALE. Well, my first thought was to get that rope off. I looked...(Stops, his face twitches.)...but Harry, he went up to him, and he said, “No, he’s dead all right, and we’d better not touch anything.”
How does the use of the word “twitches” in the stage direction most affect this scene?
It characterizes Hale as someone who is weak and cannot handle difficult aspects of the job.
It emphasizes the fact that death is a difficult subject for Mr. Hale and causes him discomfort.
It hints to the reader that Hale may have somehow been involved and is acting out of guilt.
It reveals to the reader that Hale is extremely upset because he and Mr. Wright were very close.
How does religion affect a person’s fear of crime?
Answer:
Religion can affect a person's fear of crime in various ways, depending on their individual beliefs and values, as well as the teachings and practices of their faith.
For some people, religion may provide a sense of comfort and security that can help to alleviate their fear of crime. For example, someone who has a strong belief in a higher power or in the protection of their faith may feel more confident and reassured that they are being watched over and kept safe.
On the other hand, religion may also increase a person's fear of crime if it teaches that certain actions or behaviors are sinful or immoral, or if it promotes fear and mistrust of outsiders or those who are perceived as different. For example, someone who is taught to fear or avoid certain types of people or places may be more likely to feel anxious or threatened in situations where they encounter those things.
Overall, religion can have both positive and negative effects on a person's fear of crime, depending on the specific beliefs and practices of their faith, as well as their personal experiences and perspective.
Answer:
If everyone in the world was religious crime would be very rare.
It would affect their fear because in most religious book's crime is unacceptable.
Explanation:
What is the conclusion of civil disobedience movement?
The conclusion of civil disobedience movement is the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
The Civil Rights Legislation of 1968, was an act that outlawed discrimination in the sale or rental of housing, The Voting Rights Act of 1965, which restored voting rights, and this act, which forbade discrimination in employment practises and public accommodations.
Civil disobedience has generally been proven to be effective throughout history.
Government and public policy have been changed as a result, and it has also helped socially marginalized groups gain acceptance and equality for people who have experienced discrimination.
Rosa Parks made the equal rights movement for people of color more well-known by refusing to give up her seat to a white man out of respect for his civil rights.
To know more about civil disobedience, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/10905304
#SPJ4
If you find yIf you find yourself in need of cash, the LEAST expensive option is likely to be:
Answer: no one gonna help you :0
Explanation:
School is lame
Explain the four types of bill
Ordinary Bill:
A draft containing a proposed statute.
Money Bill:
A bill that solely concerns taxation or government spending.
Financial Bill:
A bill that concerns the country's finances.
Constitutional Amendment Bills:
A modification of the constitution of a polity.
What was Mendel's initial question?
Mia offers Nevin, a building inspector, money to overlook the violations in her new warehouse. Nevin accepts the money and overlooks the violations. Mia is charged with the crime of bribery. The crime occurred when ?
a. Mia offered the bribe.
b. Mia decided to offer the bribe.
c. Nevin accepted the bribe.
d. Nevin overlooked the violations.
Mia has been charged with bribery. Mia committed the crime by offering the bribe. Bribery is punishable by imprisonment of any kind for a term up to a year, a fine, or both.
Bribery is defined as the offering, giving, soliciting, or receiving of anything of value in order to influence the actions of someone with a public or legal duty. This type of action results in matters that should be handled objectively being handled in the manner best suited to the decision-maker's private interests. Bribery is thus a crime, and both the offer and the recipient can face criminal charges.
To learn more about Bribery, please refer:
https://brainly.com/question/13808122
#SPJ4
A harh drought killed ome of the farm family’ corn and everal head of it cattle. Where on the production poibilitie curve could you poition a point to reflect thee circumtance?
A harsh drought killed some of the farm family’s corn and several head of it cattle. So, on the inside of the production possibilities curve you could poition a point in order to reflect these circumtances.
The production possibilities curve (PPC) is considered to be a graph which tends to show all of the different combinations of the output that can be produced when given the current resources and technology.
However, in order to reflect such circumtances, you could poition a point on the inside of the production poibilities curve. Thus, the slope of the production possibility curve is considered to be the marginal opportunity cost.Hence, the production possibility curve is concave to the origin.
To learn more about the production possibilities curve (PPC) here:
https://brainly.com/question/28289494
#SPJ4
Which law passed by parliament led to a famous event where colonists dressed up as native americans and committed acts of vandalism and destruction?
a. Stamp Act
b. Sugar Act
c. Townshend Acts
d. Tea Act
Option d: Law passed by parliament led to a famous event where colonists dressed up as Native Americans and committed acts of vandalism and destruction is tea act.
In 1773 Parliament passed the Tea Act intended to help the financially struggling East India Company.
- a monopoly on all tea exported to the colony;
- export tax exemption; and
- Duty “refund” (refund) for certain excess tea in possession.
Tea sent to the colonies was to be transported only on East India Company ships and sold only through their own agents, bypassing independent colonial shippers and traders. .
This allowed the company to sell its tea in the United States or England at a lower price than usual. It could undermine someone else.
To learn more about 'Tea act', here:
https://brainly.com/question/5567830
#SPJ4
What did William Blackstone believe the purpose of law was?
The purpose of Blackstone's commentary on England law was to provide a readable source of common law for most people.
This work was divided into his four volumes:
Human rights, property rights, private and public wrongs.
One of his core beliefs is that laws are designed to protect the innocent, not to convict the guilty. Blackstone thus worked for a law firm that did not plead guilty to defendants.
Another of William Blackstone's beliefs was that citizens had certain rights that they could exercise against what they considered government excesses, including freedom of the press.
William Blackstone's third great belief was that all laws come from God, or at least from the natural order of the universe.
To learn more about 'William Blackstone', here:
https://brainly.com/question/30133256
#SPJ4
odtient The
2. A galleries of without sking his partner has somethiscant in front of the team wila
his car is partner sets hit with the ball, losing an eye and wants to sue for negligence
4. A fan a wridgley gets hit down the 3rd baseline with a line drive and suffers a brain
Hemorrhage He was paying for a beer at the time
Answer:
Ben was going too fast when he hit a slick spot and lost control of the car.
Explanation:
The Cubs were leading 3-0 over the Florida Marlins.
In 2028, the Republican Party controls the U.S. Senate and
the Democratic Party controls the U.S. House of
Representatives. Each party hopes its candidate can win
the presidential election, giving the party more of a say in
the country's policies. It's a close race in the end, 51
percent of Americans vote for Republican candidate Ted
Torres. Former U.S. senator Rosa Marcus, the Democratic
candidate, receives 5 more electoral votes than Torres -
just enough for her to reach a total of 270 electoral votes.
According to the rules of the Electoral College, Marcus will win the election.
What adjustment to the Electoral College would change this outcome?
Answer:
A. All states splitting their electoral college votes between candidates based on what percentage of the Popular vote won.
Explanation:
Since Torres has the popular vote he would have the advantage to gain more electoral votes, but even with than, it doesn't guarantee a win in face:
Democratic Popular vote comes mainly from the State of California, and the NorthEast Section of the United States, the rest of the state follow alone, to give them more votes, although this is happening Marcus could still pickup several states, and electoral votes, even if Torres has more votes, not to mention safe states.
The Implied consent law states that : a. You must submit to a sobriety test when asked by a law enforcement officer. b. You can agree to plea bargain if arrested for DUI. c. you will lose your license for six months if convicted.
d. your license will automatically be canceled if you are convicted of
d.u.i.
The Implied consent law states that option A: You must submit to a sobriety test when asked by a law enforcement officer.
According to the implied consent statute, when a law enforcement official requests that you submit to chemical testing of your breath, blood, or urine to discover whether you have consumed alcohol or drugs, you have given your consent. Therefore, option A proves to be he right choice.
Law enforcement organizations employ implied consent statutes as a tactic to obtain proof that you were driving while intoxicated. Without a BAC test, a DUI charge may still be brought against you. However, the results of these tests show that you were inebriated, which might be used against you in a DUI case. Even some states claim that the legislation governing implied consent applies to initial breathalyzer testing (PBT). A PBT is essentially another kind of field sobriety test that law enforcement does to gauge a subject's level of intoxication.
To know more about implied consent law, refer to the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/1283484
#SPJ4
How is judicial activism connected to the idea of a loose interpretation of the US Constitution?
The judicial activist philosophy interprets the Constitution to include personal opinions and prejudices about what the text of the Constitution actually means and represents, not just what is explicitly written.
For example, the Constitution says you have the right to free speech under the First Amendment. But thanks to legal action, we understand that hate speech falls outside the scope of free speech.
Judicial activism is the decision of judges to overlook precedent or previous constitutional interpretations in order to protect individual rights or the broader political agenda.
The term can be used to describe a judge's actual or perceived approach to judicial review.
To learn more about 'judicial activist', here:
https://brainly.com/question/29629831
#SPJ4
What are independent executive agencies?
A. Specialized agencies that regulate the economy and are not
directly controlled by the president
B. Informal advisory groups assembled by the president to serve his
or her needs
C. The major departments of the executive branch that are led by the
president's cabinet
D. Agencies with specialized functions that are controlled by the
president but exist outside of the major departments
Answer:
A. Specialized agencies that regulate the economy and are not directly controlled by the president
Explanation:
An independent executive agency refers to a type of agency created by the US Congress using a legislative Act (statutes), so as to operate as a regulatory and service agency setting standards and overseeing the functions of the federal government.
This ultimately implies that, independent executive agencies refers to specialized agencies that regulate the economy and are not directly controlled by the president. Thus, they established to exist outside the Executive Office of the President and the federal executive departments
Some examples of independent executive agencies are Federal Communications Commission (FCC), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Election Assistance Commission (EAC), Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), Federal Election Commission (FEC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), etc.
What has research into the success of probation and parole concluded?
Answer:
parole is so a prisoner can enjpy some freedom but probation is like being free but you can do anything
Explanation:
When is using your headlights required by Virginia law?
When is it legal in Virginia to use your headlights. Every vehicle operating on a Commonwealth highway must have functioning headlights and other lighting.
From dusk to dawn, when a driver can see no further than 500 feet, and when the windscreen wipers are in operation, headlights must be used. the USA: VIRGINIA Most drivers activate their windscreen wipers when it starts to rain. The requirement to also have the vehicle's headlights on is legal in Virginia. When the new year arrives, a number of new laws will go into effect in Virginia, including a limit on police ticket quotas, a new marijuana possession charge, modifications to medicinal marijuana licences, misdemeanour reporting requirements for school principals, among other things.
Virginia law at the moment According to Virginia State Law 46.2-1030, every driver on a route inside the Commonwealth must use lit headlights between the hours of sunset and daybreak. when rain, fog, sleet, or snow is the cause of the need for windscreen wipers.
Read more about Virginia law at
https://brainly.com/question/30194965
#SPJ4
“Boundary fence question” A Neighbours shed wall is on the boundary line and a fence is built, as close to the shed as possible the palings are on our side. Is the fence line after 15 years taken as the new boundary line In adverse possession law (I live in Victoria, Australia.)?
No jurisdiction would give adverse possession to someone after only three years of inhabiting a sliver of property.
What exactly is an Adverse Possession?Adverse possession, also known colloquially as "squatter's rights," is a legal principle in Anglo-American common law that allows a person who does not have legal title to a piece of property—usually land (real property)—to acquire legal ownership through continuous possession or occupation of the property without the permission (license) of the property's legal owner. Possession by a person is not detrimental if they are in possession as the lawful owner's renter or licensee.
To learn more about adverse possession, click
https://brainly.com/question/29988444
#SPJ1
I Reciprocity a ueful tool to overcome problem that arie from relying on eaily-available information
The statement that Reciprocity is a useful tool to overcome problems that arise from relying on easily-available information is false.
Reciprocity is the fundamental aspect which is used to negotiate in tough situations. It is used to influence people and requires other features such as commitment, consistency and psychological approach as well. In social dilemma when people are not ready to cooperate, this technique helps in sorting the problems and coming to a conclusive point. The use of reciprocity involves healthy communication skills, dialogue and action, discussion and feedback and brain-storming or training. Thus a comprehensive approach enables the better negotiation capacity among the parties involved and they agree to mutual decisions and objectives.
Learn more about reciprocity at:
brainly.com/question/18575915
#SPJ4
Leah gains access to government records and alters certain dates and amounts in her favor. This is a. embezzlement. b. forgery. c. larceny. d. no crime.
The correct answer is B) forgery. Leah obtains access to official documents and changes specific dates and quantities to her advantage. This is a fabrication of embezzlement.
Altering, using fake documents and tools, and writing falsely on any documents with the intent to fool the other are all examples of forgery and fabrication. When someone else signs or when someone writes something that is false, it happens.
False document utterance is a serious offence that carries a penalty. Documents that can be falsified include checks, negotiable instruments, contracts, wills, and deeds, to name a few. However, forgery also includes some documents that are routinely used in the business sector despite having no legal standing, such as a fake letter of recommendation for employment.
Read more about records embezzlement at
https://brainly.com/question/12882997
#SPJ4
cases involving citizens from two different states would be heard in a:
Answer:
The Federal Court
Explanation:
Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human right violations
Answer:
they are part of UN and they are not oppresive
Explanation:
Name at least 3 characteristics of Hispanic street gangs
Three characteristics of Hispanic street gangs are:
1. In the color of their attire which can be black, brown, khaki, or white.
2. Tattoos and Flashing of hand signs.
3. Structurally organized to protect the interests of gang members.
The #13 is spray painted on the side of a liquor store. What night this mean to police?
Answer:
The number 13 correlates to the 13th letter of the alphabet M. Short for Eme or the Mexican Mafia.
Tagging is normally a way for gangs to mark their territory.
Which system has a central government and local units that implement the central government’s decisions?
A.
monarchical system
B.
unitary system
C.
federal system
D.
parliamentary system
Answer:
i think its c.................
Broker Audrey has a listing agreement with seller Scarlett. One of Audrey's salespeople commits a license law violation while interacting with Scarlett. Audrey
1 could be responsible due to vicarious liability.
2 cannot be responsible for the actions of others as a broker even if she knew they were breaking the law.
3 will not receive as large of a commission.
4 should void the listing agreement.
In case of Audrey's salesperson violating license law, Audrey could be held responsible due to vicarious liability, which means option A is correct.
Listing agreement is the legal contract made between the service broker and the property owner which consists of exclusive rights to sell listing. Thus the right of selling the property to a new customer is given to the broker. If any of the employee from the broker's side breaks the law, then they are liable for the compensation and punishment. Vicarious liability is the responsibility one individual has over the actions committed by other. It is caused due to negligence of the top employee and and breach of duty bound care. It can occur due to lack of communication between the broker and the salesperson.
Learn more about listing agreement at:
brainly.com/question/28474097
#SPJ4
In cases where informed decision makers such as trained medical staff or governmental officials agree that a research study has the potential to benefit a large number of people, written informed consent from participants is not needed.
The correct answer is False. Written informed permission from participants is not necessary when knowledgeable decision makers, such as skilled medical personnel or government authorities, concur that a research project has the potential to be helpful to many people.
A fundamental tenet of research ethics is informed consent. Its goal is to ensure that human participants can enter research freely (voluntarily), that they are fully informed of what it means to participate, and that they provide consent before entering the study.
Respect for people demands that subjects be given the option to decide what will or won't happen to them, to the extent that they are capable. When appropriate criteria for informed consent are met, this option is granted.
Read more about decision makers at
https://brainly.com/question/29035403
#SPJ4