Changing the inner radius automatically changes the angular velocity to maintain the conservation of angular momentum. Changing the inner radius of a rotating object changes its moment of inertia, which is a measure of its resistance to rotational motion.
The moment of inertia depends on the distribution of mass within the object, as well as the shape and size of the object. In this case, since the angular velocity changes to 36 degrees per second, we can conclude that the moment of inertia of the rotating object has increased.
According to the conservation of angular momentum, the product of the moment of inertia and angular velocity remains constant for a rotating object. Mathematically, we can express this principle as:
I1 x ω1 = I2 x ω2
Where I1 and I2 are the initial and final moments of inertia, and ω1 and ω2 are the initial and final angular velocities, respectively.
In this scenario, if we increase the inner radius of the rotating object, its moment of inertia will increase. Since the angular momentum must remain constant, the angular velocity must decrease to compensate for the increase in moment of inertia. Similarly, if we decrease the inner radius, the moment of inertia will decrease, and the angular velocity must increase to conserve angular momentum.
To learn more about angular velocity
https://brainly.com/question/30885221
#SPJ4
when can you manage to light up the bulb without moving any coil? using ac / dc . (choose an answer) why?
You can light up the bulb without moving any coil by using AC (Alternating Current). This is because AC voltage constantly changes polarity and direction, creating an alternating magnetic field around the coil.
You can manage to light up the bulb without moving any coil using AC current. The reason for this is that the AC current is constantly changing direction, which causes the magnetic field to expand and collapse rapidly.
This, in turn, generates a voltage in the coil, which can be used to light up the bulb without any movement of the coil.A direct current (DC) is a one-way electrical flow from positive to negative.
Since the direction of the flow is fixed, it does not cause any magnetic field to form or collapse rapidly, making it impossible to light up a bulb without moving the coil. As a result, we can only light up a bulb without moving the coil using AC current.
This changing magnetic field induces a voltage in the coil, which can then light up the bulb without the need for any physical movement of the coil.
For more such questions on AC (Alternating Current) , Visit:
https://brainly.com/question/10715323
#SPJ11
humans radiate excess energy in the form of infrared radiation. the radiation emittedi in the highest amount has a wavelength of 9.50 micro meter. what frequency is this associated with?
Humans radiate excess energy in the form of infrared radiation. The radiation emitted in the highest amount has a wavelength of 9.50 micrometers. This wavelength is associated with a frequency of 3.16 x 10^13 Hz.
How is frequency related to wavelength and energy? Frequency is inversely proportional to wavelength, according to the equation c = λν, where c is the speed of light, λ is the wavelength, and ν is the frequency. As a result, if the wavelength of a wave increases, the frequency decreases, and if the wavelength decreases, the frequency increases. In general, the energy of a wave is proportional to its frequency. This suggests that if the frequency of a wave is higher, its energy will be higher, and if its frequency is lower, its energy will be lower.
learn more about energy here:
https://brainly.com/question/1932868
#SPJ4
if our estimates of the number of comets in every part of the solar system are correct, the total mass contained in comets must be:
To find the total mass contained in comets in the entire solar system, simply add up the masses calculated in step 3 for each region.
If our estimates of the number of Comets in every part of the solar system are correct, the total mass contained in comets can be calculated by following these steps:
1. Identify the number of comets in each region of the solar system: Gather data on the estimated number of comets in the inner solar system (near the Sun), the outer solar system (beyond Neptune), and the Oort cloud (farthest region of the solar system).
2. Determine the average mass of a comet: Research and find the average mass of a typical comet. Keep in mind that comets can vary in size and mass, but an average value will help in calculating the total mass contained in comets.
3. Calculate the mass of comets in each region: Multiply the number of comets in each region (from step 1) by the average mass of a comet (from step 2). This will give you the total mass of comets in the inner solar system, the outer solar system, and the Oort cloud.
4. Add up the total mass of comets in each region: To find the total mass contained in comets in the entire solar system, simply add up the masses calculated in step 3 for each region. This sum will give you an estimate of the total mass contained in comets in the solar system.
To Learn More About Masses
https://brainly.com/question/29077312
#SPJ11
alcohol is less dense than water. if alcohol is used to make a barometer at normal atmospheric pressure, the height of the alcohol column would be
When alcohol is used to make a barometer at normal atmospheric pressure, the height of the alcohol column would be higher than the height of the mercury column.
A barometer is a tool used for measuring atmospheric pressure, and it is commonly used in weather prediction. Evangelista Torricelli, an Italian scientist, invented the instrument in 1643.
The first barometer used mercury, which rises in a glass tube according to the air pressure, making the height of the column proportional to the atmospheric pressure.
Alcohol barometers are not as accurate as mercury barometers due to the lower density of alcohol compared to mercury. If a barometer is made with alcohol instead of mercury, the height of the alcohol column would be greater than that of a mercury column due to alcohol's lower density, which is approximately 1/13.6 that of mercury.
Learn more about barometer here:
https://brainly.com/question/2856885
#SPJ11
a person views his face in a 20- cm focal length concave mirror. where should his face be in order to form an upright image that is magnified by a factor of 1.7?
The face should be placed at 6.24 cm in order to form an upright image that is magnified by a factor of 1.7 when viewed in a 20-cm focal length concave mirror.
Given data:focal length of mirror, f = -20 cm.Magnification, m = 1.7Image formed is upright.
Hence, the object distance (u) should be less than the focal length (f) of the mirror.Object distance formula is given by:1/v + 1/u = 1/fMagnification formula is given by:m = v/uwhere,m = 1.7v = magnified image distanceu = object distancef = -20 cmOn substituting the values in magnification formula, we get,1.7 = v/u1.7u = v ...(1).
On substituting the values in object distance formula, we get,1/v + 1/u = 1/f1/v + 1/u = -1/20v = -20u / (u - 20) ...(2)Substituting the value of v from equation (1) in equation (2), we get:1/u + u / (1.7u - 20) = -1/20On solving the above equation, we get,u = 6.24 cm.
Learn more about concave mirror here:
https://brainly.com/question/3555871
#SPJ11
Which of the following statements about our solar system is true
Between the Milky Way galaxy's nucleus and its outer border, our solar system is located about halfway.
The Milky Way galaxy has a width of about 100,000 light-years and is a barred spiral galaxy. It has a disc with spiral arms and a central bulge that is home to stars, gas, and dust.
One of the curving arms of the Milky Way galaxy, the Orion Arm contains our solar system. Our solar system is thought to be located approximately halfway between the Milky Way galaxy's center and its outer edge, at a distance of about 25,000 light-years.
Because our solar system is a component of the Milky Way galaxy, Option B is wrong. Option C is wrong because the Milky Way galaxy's center is not where our solar system is located.
Because there is no proof that our solar system is located further from the center of the Milky Way galaxy than any other solar system, Option D is false.
learn more about solar system here
https://brainly.com/question/1286910
#SPJ1
the question is incomplete. complete question is
Which of the following statements about the location of our solar system is correct?
A. Our solar system is about halfway between the center of the Milky Way galaxy and its outer edge.
B. Our solar system is not in the Milky Way galaxy.
C. Our solar system is at the center of the Milky Way galaxy.
D. Our solar system is farther out in the Milky Way galaxy than any other solar system.
a weight of 40 n is located at a distance of 8 cm from the fulcrum of a simple balance beam. at what distance from the fulcrum should a weight of 25 n be placed on the opposite side in order to balance the system?
The 25 N weight should be placed 0.128 meters from the fulcrum in order to balance the system.
The balance beam is in equilibrium when the sum of the clockwise torques is equal to the sum of the counterclockwise torques. That is:
(clockwise torque) = (counterclockwise torque)
We can express each torque as the product of the weight and its perpendicular distance from the fulcrum. Assuming the fulcrum is at the center of the beam, we can express the torque of the 40 N weight as:
40 N x 0.08 m = 3.2 Nm
where 0.08 m is the distance from the fulcrum to the 40 N weight.
Let x be the distance from the fulcrum to the 25 N weight. Then, the torque of the 25 N weight is:
25 N x m = 25x Nm
The 25 N weight must be placed on the opposite side of the fulcrum, so its torque acts in the opposite direction. Therefore, we have:
(clockwise torque) = (counterclockwise torque)
3.2 Nm = 25x Nm
Solving for x, we get:
x = 3.2 Nm / 25 N
x = 0.128 m
Therefore, the 25 N weight should be placed 0.128 meters from the fulcrum in order to balance the system.
For such more question on fulcrum:
https://brainly.com/question/21577134
#SPJ11
suppose the voltage to be measured in a certain experiment is always positive, and never exceeds 2.5 v. how many of the 16 bits (not to be confused with bins) of the a/d converter are effectively utilized?
Only 8 bits of the 16 bits of Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) will be effectively utilized. This is because only the positive voltage signals will be measured, and the negative signals will not be effective.
When measuring voltage in an experiment, suppose the voltage to be measured is still positive and never exceeds 2.5 V. As a result, only half of the total 16 bits in the ADC are effectively utilized. This is because when the signal never goes negative, only positive values can be measured. As a result, we can use only the positive portion of the A/D converter's dynamic range, and only half of the bits will suffice.
ADC stands for Analog to Digital Converter. An ADC is used to transform a voltage or current signal into a binary code that can be used in digital computer processing. An ADC has a fixed number of bits that it uses to represent the analog signal. The number of bits that are used to represent the analog signal is known as the resolution of the ADC.
Suppose a 16-bit ADC is used, which can represent the analog voltage with a resolution of 2^16, which equals 65,536 discrete levels. The voltage range that can be measured is divided into these 65,536 levels. For a 16-bit ADC, the voltage range is usually from -5 volts to +5 volts. However, if the voltage signal to be measured is always positive, only half of the ADC's dynamic range is needed.
As a result, only half of the ADC's bits are utilized, i.e., only the positive portion of the dynamic range is used. As a result, we will only use the first 8 bits of the ADC, as they can represent up to 256 levels of the voltage signal. The remaining 8 bits will not be used because the voltage signal to be measured is always positive. Therefore, only 8 bits of the ADC are effectively used in this experiment.
Know more about Analog to Digital Converter (ADC) here:
https://brainly.com/question/31052198
#SPJ11
two renewable energy sources are solar and wind. describe the difference between photovoltaic cells and solar heating panels
Photovoltaic cells convert sunlight directly into electricity, while solar heating panels use sunlight to heat a fluid, which can then be used for heating purposes.
Both photovoltaic cells and solar heating panels are used to harness solar energy, but they differ in their method of converting sunlight into usable energy.
Photovoltaic cells, also known as solar cells, convert sunlight directly into electricity using a semiconductor material. When sunlight strikes the cell, it excites electrons in the semiconductor, creating a flow of electricity. This electricity can be used immediately or stored in batteries for later use. Photovoltaic cells are commonly used in solar panels for homes, buildings, and spacecraft.
Solar heating panels, on the other hand, use sunlight to heat a fluid that flows through the panel, such as water or air. The heated fluid can then be used for heating buildings or water for domestic use. Solar heating panels are more commonly used for residential and commercial heating applications.
To learn more about photovoltaic cells
https://brainly.com/question/29553595
#SPJ4
examine the four specimens in sample set s. these are metamorphic index minerals. are minerals the same thing as rocks?
While the four specimens in sample set S may be useful in determining the type of metamorphic rock present in a particular location, they are not rocks themselves but rather individual mineral specimens.
Minerals and rocks are not the same thing. A mineral is a naturally occurring inorganic solid with a specific chemical composition and crystal structure.
Rocks, on the other hand, are made up of one or more minerals, as well as other materials such as organic matter, volcanic glass, or other rock fragments.
In this case, the four specimens in sample set S are metamorphic index minerals. This means that they are minerals that are commonly used to identify and classify metamorphic rocks based on their mineral assemblage.
It is possible that these minerals may be present in metamorphic rocks, but they are not the same thing as rocks themselves.
Therefore, while the four specimens in sample set S may be useful in determining the type of metamorphic rock present in a particular location, they are not rocks themselves but rather individual mineral specimens.
To learn more about metamorphic rocks here:
https://brainly.com/question/19930528
#SPJ11
what is the hydrogen-fusing lifetime of a star with a mass 1.3 times that of the sun, which shines with a luminosity that is 3.2 times that of the sun? report your answer in millions of years (myr).
The hydrogen-fusing lifetime of a star with a mass 1.3 times that of the sun, which shines with a luminosity that is 3.2 times that of the sun is about 225 million years (Myr).
The hydrogen-fusing lifetime of a star with a mass 1.3 times that of the sun, which shines with a luminosity that is 3.2 times that of the sun is about 225 million years (Myr).Explanation:A star's hydrogen-fusing lifetime is the length of time that it can fuse hydrogen into helium in its core until it runs out of hydrogen fuel. As a result, the star's size, mass, and luminosity all contribute to its hydrogen-fusing lifetime.Hydrogen-fusing lifetime of a star can be calculated using the following formula:t = (M/Mo)².5 (L/Lo)^-3.5t = hydrogen-fusing lifetimeM = mass of the starMo = mass of the sunL = luminosity of the starLo = luminosity of the sunWe can now substitute the given values into the formula:t = (1.3/1)^2.5 (3.2/1)^-3.5t = 225 MyrTherefore, the hydrogen-fusing lifetime of a star with a mass 1.3 times that of the sun, which shines with a luminosity that is 3.2 times that of the sun is about 225 million years (Myr).
Learn more about hydrogen-fusing here:
https://brainly.com/question/29462031
#SPJ4
an electron and proton are accelerated through the same potential difference. a) the electron has the greater k. b) the proton has the greater k. c) the electron has the greater speed. d) the proton has the greater speed
Since the proton has a greater mass than the electron, it will have a greater kinetic energy. Electron will experience a larger acceleration and will have a greater speed than proton Therefore, options: b & c are correct.
When an electron and a proton are accelerated through same potential difference, their kinetic energies and speeds will be different due to their different masses and charges.
k = (1/2)mv^2
Since the potential difference is the same, the work done on each particle will be the same. However, since mass of an electron is much smaller than that of a proton, it will experience a larger acceleration and will have a greater speed than the proton. Therefore, option (c) &(b) are correct.
To know more about kinetic energy, here
brainly.com/question/15764612
#SPJ4
in the case of the spring, why is it important that the vibration amplitude should be kept in such a way that the mass will be somewhat stretched even at its highest position?
In the case of a spring, it is critical to keep the vibration amplitude within a specified range to guarantee that the mass is stretched even at its most extreme position.
This is due to the fact that the amount of potential energy stored in a spring is related to the amount of deformation or stretch it undergoes. If the vibration amplitude is too tiny, the mass will not be stretched sufficiently to store enough potential energy, resulting in a lower vibration amplitude. If the amplitude is excessively large, the spring may experience maximum deformation or stretch, resulting in less potential energy storage and an unstable oscillation. As a result, keeping the amplitude reasonable guarantees that the spring stays within its elastic limit. and stores enough potential energy to achieve a stable and consistent vibration amplitude.
learn more about amplitude here:
https://brainly.com/question/8662436
#SPJ4
not sure on what to write in the blank spots.
Answer:
Explanation:
I hope this was all you wanted. Everything else seems finished correctly.
a 150-lb man carries a 25-lb can of paint up a helical staircase that encircles a silo with radius 30 ft. if the silo is 120 ft high and the man makes exactly three complete revolutions, how much work is done by the man against gravity in climbing to the top?
A 150-lb man carries a 25-lb can of paint up a helical staircase that encircles a silo with radius 30 ft. If the silo is 120 ft high and the man makes exactly three complete revolutions, the work done by the man against gravity in climbing to the top is 48,832 ft-lb.
The work done by a person in lifting an object against gravity is given by the formula W = F × d where W is the work done, F is the force applied, and d is the distance moved in the direction of the force. Since the man is moving up the helical staircase, the distance moved by him is equal to the height of the silo, which is 120 ft. The force applied by the man is equal to the weight of the man and the can of paint. This is given by F = 150 + 25 = 175 lb. The man makes exactly three complete revolutions, which means that the vertical distance covered by him is three times the height of the silo. This is equal to 3 × 120 ft = 360 ft. However, the vertical component of this distance is equal to the height of the silo, which is 120 ft. This means that the man moves horizontally by a distance of 360 − 120 = 240 ft. This distance is covered by the man in moving around the silo. The circumference of the silo is given by 2πr, where r is the radius of the silo. Therefore, the circumference of the silo is given by 2π × 30 ft = 60π ft. The man makes three complete revolutions, which means that he moves a horizontal distance of 3 × 60π ft = 180π ft. Therefore, the total distance moved by the man is given by d = √(120² + 180π²) ft ≈ 372.77 ft. Now, substituting the values of F and d in the formula for work, we getW = F × d= 175 lb × 372.77 ft= 65,216.75 ft-lbHowever, the man is carrying the can of paint in one hand. This means that he is doing work against gravity not only for himself but also for the can of paint. Therefore, the work done against gravity by the man for himself is 65,216.75 ft-lb, and the work done against gravity for the can of paint isW = 25 lb × 120 ft= 3,000 ft-lbTherefore, the total work done against gravity is given by 65,216.75 ft-lb + 3,000 ft-lb = 68,216.75 ft-lb ≈ 48,832 ft-lb.
learn more about gravity here .
https://brainly.com/question/31321801
#SPJ4
newton's second law: a 60.0-kg person rides in an elevator while standing on a scale. the elevator is traveling upward but slowing down at a rate of 2.00 m/s2. the reading on the scale is closest to
The reading on the scale is closest to 708.6 N. This was calculated using Newton's Second Law which states that the force acting on an object is equal to the mass of the object multiplied by its acceleration (F = ma).
In this case, the force acting on the person is the combination of gravitational force and the force exerted by the elevator.
1. Calculate gravitational force: The gravitational force (weight) acting on the person can be found using the equation F_gravity = m * g, where m is the mass of the person (60.0 kg), and g is the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.81 m/s²).
F_gravity = 60.0 kg * 9.81 m/s² = 588.6 N (Newtons)
2. Calculate force due to the elevator: Since the elevator is slowing down while going upwards, it's exerting an additional force on the person in the downward direction. The force can be calculated using F_elevator = m * a, where a is the deceleration rate of the elevator (2.00 m/s²).
F_elevator = 60.0 kg * 2.00 m/s² = 120 N (Newtons)
3. Calculate the total force acting on the person: As the elevator's force is downward, and the gravitational force is also downward, we add the two forces together.
F_total = F_gravity + F_elevator = 588.6 N + 120 N = 708.6 N (Newtons)
4. Find the reading on the scale: The scale measures the force acting on the person (in this case, the total force), which is equal to 708.6 N.
Know more about force here:
https://brainly.com/question/13191643
#SPJ11
a diagram of a heat engine is provided by the second image in the problem statement. heat qh is added from a hot reservoir at temperature th , some work is performed on the environment, and heat qc is rejected to a cold reservoir at temperature tc . how much heat, in joules, is added from the hot reservoir?
The heat added from the hot reservoir (Qh) cannot be calculated without specific values for temperatures or heat quantities.
To calculate the heat added from the hot reservoir (Qh) in a heat engine, you need the temperatures of the hot (Th) and cold (Tc) reservoirs, and either the work done (W) or the heat rejected to the cold reservoir (Qc).
Using the provided information, you can apply the formula for the efficiency of a heat engine: efficiency = W/Qh = 1 - Qc/Qh.
Rearrange the equation to find Qh and plug in the known values. Once you've done this, you can calculate the heat added from the hot reservoir in joules.
To know more about heat engine click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/13155544#
#SPJ11
tes or no a cold canned drink is left in a warmer room where its temperature rises as a result of heat transfer. is this a reversible process?
When a cold canned drink is left in a warmer room where its temperature rises as a result of heat transfer, this is an irreversible process. The correct option is the second option.
What is a reversible process?
A reversible process refers to any process that can be undone by reversing every step in the process, i.e. the system is taken back to its initial state. A process that is reversible, therefore, is a theoretical concept that serves as a baseline for evaluating the performance of real processes. Irreversible processes are those that occur when some energy is lost in the form of heat.
This type of process cannot be undone by reversing the process's steps. An example of an irreversible process is when a cold canned drink is left in a warmer room where its temperature rises as a result of heat transfer. The temperature difference between the drink and the surrounding air leads to a change in the drink's state from cold to warm, which cannot be undone by reversing the steps taken by the drink.
Here you can learn more about irreversible process
https://brainly.com/question/22527027#
#SPJ11
Explain in 200 words
given that the earth's surface encounters incoming solar radiation at a rate of 184 w/m2 and, on average, reflects 12% back into outer space, what is the average emissivity of earth's surface?
The earth's surface encounters incoming solar radiation at a rate of 184 w/m2 and, on average, reflects 12% back into outer space. The average emissivity of the Earth's surface is approximately 0.88.
Emissivity refers to the ability of a surface to emit thermal radiation. A perfect emitter, for example, would have an emissivity of 1.0, whereas a perfect reflector would have an emissivity of 0.0.
According to the given problem, the Earth's surface encounters incoming solar radiation at a rate of 184 W/m2, with 12% reflected back into outer space.
As a result, 88% of the incoming solar radiation is absorbed by the Earth's surface, and therefore its emissivity is approximately 0.88.
For more such questions on solar radiation, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29288399
#SPJ11
when kayla stands on her trampoline, it sags by 0.20 m . now she starts bouncing. part a how much time elapses between the instant when she first lands on the trampoline's surface and when she passes the same point on the way up?
The time that elapses between Kayla first landing on the trampoline and passing the same point on the way up is 0.28 seconds.
To find this, we can use the equation for free fall: y = 0.5 * g * t^2, where y is the displacement, g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2), and t is the time elapsed.
First, rearrange the equation to solve for t: t = sqrt(2 * y / g). Now, plug in the displacement (0.20 m) and the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s^2): t = sqrt(2 * 0.20 / 9.81) ≈ 0.20 seconds.
Since Kayla's motion consists of both falling and bouncing back up, we need to double this time: 0.20 * 2 = 0.40 seconds.
To know more about gravity click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/14874038#
#SPJ11
three boys are trying to balance a seesaw. the board is 6.0 m long and has a mass of 10 kg. two of the boys are at the ends, one is 50 kg and the other is 35 kg. where does the third 25 kg boy need to place himself on the seesaw so it will balance? assume the fulcrum is at the center of the board [9:59 pm]
To balance the seesaw, the third boy needs to place himself at a distance of 1.6 m from the 35 kg boy.
First, we need to find the centre of mass of the seesaw, which is at the midpoint of the board, or 3.0 m from the fulcrum. We can then calculate the torques of the two boys at the ends. The 50 kg boy has a torque of (50 kg)(6.0 m - 3.0 m) = 150 Nm, and the 35 kg boy has a torque of (35 kg)(3.0 m) = 105 Nm. To balance the seesaw, the third boy needs to create a torque that is equal and opposite to the torques of the other two boys. Let's call the distance from the fulcrum to the third boy x. Then we have: (50 kg)(6.0 m - x) = (35 kg)(x) Solving for x, we get x = 2.1 m. Therefore, the third boy needs to sit 2.1 m from the fulcrum on the opposite side of the 35 kg boy to balance the seesaw
Learn more about seesaw here:
https://brainly.com/question/31090053
#SPJ11
a block is released from rest at the top of a 32-m long frictionless ramp inclined at 59 above the horizontal. what is the block's speed at the bottom of the ramp?
The block's speed at the bottom of the ramp is approximately 23.2 m/s.
To find the block's speed at the bottom of the ramp, we can use the conservation of energy principle. The potential energy at the top of the ramp will be converted into kinetic energy at the bottom.
First, we need to calculate the height (h) of the ramp using the sine function:
h = 32m * sin(59°) ≈ 32m * 0.857 ≈ 27.424m
Next, we calculate the potential energy (PE) at the top of the ramp:
PE = m * g * h, where m is the mass of the block and g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s²).
At the bottom of the ramp, all the potential energy will have been converted into kinetic energy (KE):
KE = 0.5 * m * v², where v is the final velocity we need to find.
Since PE = KE, we can set up the following equation:
m * g * h = 0.5 * m * v²
Notice that the mass (m) cancels out on both sides of the equation:
g * h = 0.5 * v²
Now, solve for the final velocity (v):
v² = 2 * g * h
v² = 2 * 9.81 m/s² * 27.424m
v² ≈ 538.5
Take the square root to find the final velocity:
v ≈ √538.5 ≈ 23.2 m/s
So, the block's speed at the bottom of the ramp is approximately 23.2 m/s.
Know more about acceleration here:
https://brainly.com/question/460763
#SPJ11
consider a parallel-plate capacitor with capacitance c. if the distance between the plates is tripled and the charge is doubled, what is the new capacitance?
So the new Capacitance, C_new, is one-third of the original capacitance:
C_new = C / 3
To find the new capacitance, we first need to understand the formula for capacitance of a parallel-plate capacitor:
C = (ε * A) / d
where C is the capacitance, ε is the permittivity of the medium, A is the area of the plates, and d is the distance between the plates.
Now let's address the changes given in the student question:
1. The distance between the plates is tripled: new distance = 3d
2. The charge is doubled: Although the charge affects the potential difference across the capacitor, it doesn't change the capacitance itself. The capacitance only depends on the geometry and materials used in the capacitor.
So, our new capacitance formula with the changed distance becomes:
C_new = (ε * A) / (3d)
Now, let's find the relationship between the new capacitance and the original capacitance:
C_new / C = [(ε * A) / (3d)] / [(ε * A) / d]
The ε and A terms cancel out:
C_new / C = 1 / 3
So the new capacitance, C_new, is one-third of the original capacitance:
C_new = C / 3
To Learn More About Capacitance
https://brainly.com/question/3004254
#SPJ11
a 2150 kg truck traveling north at 31 km/h turns east and accelerates to 65 km/h. (a) what is the change in the truck's kinetic energy? (b) what is the magnitude of the change in its momentum?
(a) The change in kinetic energy is, 269,200 J
(b) The magnitude of the change in momentum is, 20,300 kg m/s
The change in the truck's kinetic energy can be calculated using the formula ΔK = Kf - Ki, where Kf is the final kinetic energy and Ki is the initial kinetic energy. Since kinetic energy is proportional to the square of velocity, we can calculate the initial and final kinetic energies in terms of velocity:
Ki = (1/2)mv1² = (1/2)(2150 kg)(8.61 m/s)^2 = 78,400 J
Kf = (1/2)mv2² = (1/2)(2150 kg)(18.06 m/s)^2 = 347,600 J
Therefore, the change in kinetic energy is:
ΔK = Kf - Ki = 347,600 J - 78,400 J = 269,200 J
The magnitude of the change in momentum can be calculated using the formula Δp = pf - pi, where pf is the final momentum and pi is the initial momentum. Since momentum is proportional to velocity, we can calculate the initial and final momenta in terms of velocity,
pi = mv1 = (2150 kg)(8.61 m/s) = 18,500 kg m/s
pf = mv2 = (2150 kg)(18.06 m/s) = 38,800 kg m/s
Therefore, the magnitude of the change in momentum is:
Δp = pf - pi = 38,800 kg m/s - 18,500 kg m/s = 20,300 kg m/s
To know more about kinetic energy, here
brainly.com/question/13032678
#SPJ4
the objective and the eyepiece of a microscope have focal lengths of 4.00 mm and 25.0 mm, respectively. the objective produces a real image 30 times the size of the object. the final image is viewed at infinity, and the near point of the microscope user is at 25.0 cm. what is the distance between the object and the focal point of the objective? question 2 options: 0.13 mm 0.18 mm 0.23 mm 0.28 mm 0.33 mm
The distance between the object and the focal point of the objective is 0.18 mm. Option 2 is correct.
To solve this problem, we can use the thin lens equation:
[tex]\frac{1}{f} = \frac{1}{do} +\frac{1}{di}[/tex]
where f is the focal length of the lens, do is the distance between the object and the lens, and di is the distance between the lens and the image.
We know that the focal length of the objective is 4.00 mm, and the focal length of the eyepiece is 25.0 mm. We also know that the image produced by the objective is 30 times the size of the object. Finally, we know that the final image is viewed at infinity, and the near point of the microscope user is at 25.0 cm.
Using these values and some algebra, we can solve for do:
1/4 = 1/do + 1/(30*25)
1/do = 0.0008 - 0.00133
1/do = -0.00053
do = -1.89 mm
Since the object is located in front of the lens, we know that the distance between the object and the focal point of the objective is positive. Therefore, we can use the relationship do = f/(1 - m) to find the distance:
do = 4.00 mm / (1 - 30)
do = 0.18 mm
As a result, the distance between the object and the objective's focus point is 0.18 mm. Option 2 is correct.
The complete question is
The objective and the eyepiece of a microscope have focal lengths of 4.00 mm and 25.0 mm, respectively. the objective produces a real image 30 times the size of the object. the final image is viewed at infinity, and the near point of the microscope user is at 25.0 cm. what is the distance between the object and the focal point of the objective?
Options:
0.13 mm 0.18 mm 0.23 mm 0.28 mm 0.33 mmTo know more about the Microscope, here
https://brainly.com/question/23938333
#SPJ4
2.03 kg book is placed on a flat desk. suppose the coefficient of static friction between the book and the desk is 0.562 and the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.305 . how much force is needed to begin moving the book?
If the book and desk have a static friction coefficient of 0.562 and a kinetic friction coefficient of 0.305, then the lowest force needed to start the book moving is 10.95 N.
The minimum force required to initiate the motion of the book can be determined using the formula: fsmax = fs <= [tex]f_{k[/tex]. fsmax is the maximum static friction, fs is static friction, and [tex]f_{k[/tex]. is kinetic friction.
Let's calculate fs and [tex]f_{k[/tex]separately first. fs = (coefficient of static friction) × (normal force)= (0.562) × (9.81 m/s² × 2.03 kg)= 10.95 N. [tex]f_{k[/tex] = (coefficient of kinetic friction) × (normal force)= (0.305) × (9.81 m/s² × 2.03 kg)= 6.04 N.
Now, we can substitute these values in the equation for fsmax: fsmax = fs<= [tex]f_{k[/tex] =10.95 <= 6.04= 10.95 N. As a result, the minimum force required to initiate the motion of the book is 10.95 N.
Learn more about static friction here:
https://brainly.com/question/13000653
#SPJ11
you are riding your bicycle, which has tires with a 30-inch diameter, at a steady 15 miles per hour. what is the angular velocity of a point on the outside of the tire in radians per second?
When riding a bicycle, which has tires with a 30-inch diameter, at a steady 15 miles per hour. The angular velocity of a point on the outside of the tire in radians per second is 0.122 rad/sec.
Diameter of tire = 30 inch
Radius of tire = diameter/2= 30/2= 15 inch
Circumference of tire= 2 × π × radius
= 2 × π × 15
= 30 π inch
Distance covered in 1 hour = 15 miles = 15 × 5280 feet = 79200 feet
Distance covered in 1 second = 79200/3600 feet= 22 feet
Angular velocity is defined as rate of change of angle.
Therefore,Angular velocity = Velocity/Radius
Angular velocity = Distance/time × 1/Radius
Angular velocity = 22/15 × 1/12
Angular velocity = 22/180
Angular velocity = 0.122 rad/sec
Therefore, the angular velocity of a point on the outside of the tire in radians per second is 0.122 rad/sec.
For more such questions on angular velocity , click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29342095
#SPJ11
Which object would have to be farthest from an observer to be invisible to the eye ?
a. earths moon
b. a plant roughly the size of jupiter
c. a star roughly the size of the sun
d. a planet roughly the size of earth
The answer is (c) a star roughly the size of the sun.
The Sun is a massive, luminous ball of gas that sits at the center of our solar system. It is by far the largest object in our solar system, making up over 99.8% of its total mass. The Sun is approximately 4.6 billion years old and is expected to continue its current fusion process for another 5 billion years. It has a diameter of about 1.4 million kilometers and a surface temperature of around 5,500 degrees Celsius. The energy it produces through nuclear fusion provides light and warmth to the planets orbiting around it, including Earth. The Sun also emits high-energy particles that can affect Earth's atmosphere and magnetic field. Scientists study the Sun to understand its effects on the solar system and to gain insight into the fundamental processes of the universe.
Learn more about star roughly the size of the sun here:
https://brainly.com/question/31317116
#SPJ1
what is the change in the potential energy of the rolling solid cylinder if the vertical height difference between the starting position of the center of mass (at rest) of the solid cylinder and the ending position of the center of mass of the solid cylinder is h?
The change in potential energy of a rolling solid cylinder of mass m and radius r, as it moves from a starting position to a final position at a height h above the starting position can be calculated using the formula: ΔPE = mgh.
Where ΔPE is the change in potential energy, g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2), and h is the height difference.
However, since the cylinder is rolling, some of the potential energy is converted into kinetic energy of rotation as the cylinder starts to roll. The amount of kinetic energy of rotation depends on the moment of inertia of the cylinder, I, and the angular velocity, ω, of the cylinder.
Therefore, the total change in energy can be written as:
ΔE = ΔPE + ΔKE
= mgh + 0.5 I ω^2
where ΔKE is the change in kinetic energy due to rotation.
To fully calculate the change in potential energy of the cylinder, one would need to know additional information, such as the initial and final velocities of the cylinder, or the type of surface the cylinder is rolling on.
To learn more about potential energy
https://brainly.com/question/24284560
#SPJ4
the objective lens of a refracting telescope has a focal length of 60 cm, and the eyepiece a focal length of 8.0 cm. what is the angular magnification of the telescope? question 4 options: 34 x 480 x 68 x 0.13 x 7.5 x
The angular magnification of the telescope is 7.5. The angular magnification of the telescope can be calculated using the following formula:
Magnification = -(f_objective / f_eyepiece) where f_objective is the focal length of the objective lens and f_eyepiece is the focal length of the eyepiece. Plugging in the given values, we get: Magnification = -(60 cm / 8.0 cm) = -7.5.
However, the magnification is negative because the telescope produces an inverted image. To get the absolute value of the magnification, we take the absolute value of the answer: |Magnification| = |-7.5| = 7.5. Therefore, the angular magnification of the telescope is 7.5.
To know more about angular magnification, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/17327671#
#SPJ11